Return to play and recurrence after calf muscle strain injuries in elite Australian football players
The short answer
What clinical and MRI factors predict how long it takes an elite footballer to return to play after a calf muscle strain, and which factors increase the risk of re-injury?
A running-related injury mechanism and MRI evidence of aponeurotic disruption are associated with a longer return to play, particularly for soleus injuries. Recurrence risk is better predicted by clinical factors, specifically older age and a prior history of calf or ankle injury, rather than MRI findings.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study149 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- Severe aponeurotic disruption (AD) on MRI was linked to significantly longer return-to-play periods compared with no AD (31.3 vs 19.4 days)
- A running-related mechanism of injury was the strongest independent predictor of delayed return to play across all calf strain injuries
- MRI findings of the index injury did NOT predict recurrence risk
- Older age increased risk of early recurrence (AHR 1.3, P=.001) and overall recurrence (AHR 1.1, P=.013)
- A prior history of calf muscle strain injury increased overall recurrence risk nearly 7-fold (AHR 6.7, P=.002)
How it was conducted
- Design
- Case-control study using the AFL Soft Tissue Injury Registry (Level of evidence 3)
- Participants
- 149 MRI-confirmed calf muscle strain injuries from elite Australian Football League players over 4 seasons (2014-2017)
- Cases
- 114 index injuries and 35 recurrent injuries
- MRI classification
- Two blinded radiologists independently classified injury location, presence and severity of aponeurotic disruption, waviness, edema length, and scar tissue
- Primary outcomes
- Days to return to play and cumulative incidence of recurrence within 2 seasons
- Analysis
- Cox proportional hazards regression with adjusted hazard ratios; Kaplan-Meier survival curves
What they found
- Players with severe AD returned to play in 31.3 +/- 12.6 days vs 19.4 +/- 10.8 days for those with no AD (P=.003)
- CMSI with any AD took on average 8.4 days longer to return to play than those without AD (27.8 +/- 15.9 days vs 19.4 +/- 10.8 days; r=0.27; P=.007)
- Running-related mechanism of injury was associated with longer RTP for all CMSI (AHR 0.59; P=.019) and soleus injuries specifically (AHR 0.55; P=.01)
- Presence of AD was associated with longer RTP for soleus injuries (AHR 0.6; P=.025)
- Older age was associated with early recurrence (AHR 1.3; P=.001) and overall recurrence (AHR 1.1; P=.013)
- Prior ankle injury increased early recurrence risk (AHR 3.9; P=.032)
- Prior calf strain history increased overall recurrence risk (AHR 6.7; P=.002) and soleus-specific recurrence (AHR 5.6; P=.005)
- Index injury MRI findings were not associated with recurrence (early: HR 0.99, P=.41; overall: HR 1.01, P=.39)
- 63.2% of early recurrences involved the same muscle, gross position, and anatomical location as the index injury
- Median time to recurrence was 58 days for soleus injuries
Limitations
- Single sport cohort (AFL) limits generalizability to other sports and non-elite populations
- Club medical personnel could not be blinded to MRI findings when managing players, potentially influencing return-to-play decisions
- No comparison with uninjured players was possible as data on non-injured athletes were not collected
- Sample was insufficient for a separate multivariable analysis of gastrocnemius injuries due to small numbers
Why it matters
- For patients
- Athletes who have had a previous calf strain or are older are at significantly higher risk of re-injury, highlighting the importance of thorough rehabilitation before returning to sport.
- For clinicians
- MRI aponeurotic disruption and a running mechanism signal longer rehabilitation timelines, but recurrence risk should be assessed primarily through clinical history, not MRI findings of the index injury.
- For readers
- This is the largest study to date linking specific MRI and clinical factors to calf strain outcomes in elite football, providing a practical framework for prognosis that prioritizes clinical history over imaging for recurrence prediction.
Source
doi:10.1177/0363546520959327
Read the original paperMore General Musculoskeletal studies
- Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in adolescent elite athletesPrimary study
- More frequent empathic communication by physical therapists is associated with improved outcomes for low-impact chronic painPrimary study
- Calf strains in athletes: a narrative review of management, injury grading, and return to sportNarrative review
- Neuroimmune interactions in musculoskeletal conditions: an introduction for cliniciansPrimary study
- Screening psychological factors in pelvic pain: validation of the Pelvic Pain Psychological Screening Questionnaire (3PSQ)Primary study
- Clinical presentation and rehabilitation progression following hamstring injury assessed by BAMIC in elite track and fieldPrimary study