More frequent empathic communication by physical therapists is associated with improved outcomes for low-impact chronic pain
In short
Does more empathic communication by physical therapists lead to better pain outcomes for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain?
Physical therapists who responded empathically more often to patients' emotional cues were associated with lower pain intensity and interference over 6 weeks of care. Patients treated by the most empathic therapists had nearly three times the reduction in pain intensity compared to those with the least empathic therapists, though the study is observational and cannot establish causation.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study31 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Physical therapists responded empathically to 67% of patient emotional cues on average, but individual rates ranged widely from 27% to 84%.
- Higher empathic response rates were associated with lower pain intensity (B = -1.29, 95% CI -2.23 to -0.36, P = .007) and lower pain interference (B = -1.07, 95% CI -2.11 to -0.03, P = .044).
- The benefit of empathic communication grew over time - the inverse relationship between empathy and pain intensity emerged around 2 weeks and was most prominent at 6 weeks.
- Patients with highly empathic therapists (top quartile, response rate 91% or above) had a 1.42-point decrease in pain intensity versus 0.47 points for the lowest quartile.
- More empathic communication was also weakly to moderately linked to greater patient positive affect and therapeutic alliance, but not to exercise adherence or attendance.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective cohort study with longitudinal audio recording of physical therapist-patient sessions
- Participants
- 31 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (pain persisting 3 or more months) and 8 physical therapists at one outpatient clinic
- Sessions recorded
- 99 audio-recorded visits across 6 weeks (initial examination plus follow-ups at approximately 2-week intervals)
- Empathy measure
- Ratio of physical therapist empathic responses to patient-initiated empathic opportunities, coded by trained reviewers (interrater reliability kappa = 0.76)
- Primary outcomes
- Brief Pain Inventory subscales for pain intensity and pain interference, collected within 48 hours of each recorded visit
- Analysis
- Repeated-measures conditional linear mixed-effects models adjusted for patient sex, age, and depressive symptoms
What they found
- Physical therapists responded empathically to 67% of patient emotional cues on average (range 27% to 84% across 8 providers).
- 899 empathic opportunities were identified across 99 visits (mean 7.3 per visit, range 0-24), with 603 empathic responses.
- More frequent empathic communication was associated with lower pain intensity: B = -1.29, 95% CI -2.23 to -0.36, P = .007.
- More frequent empathic communication was associated with lower pain interference: B = -1.07, 95% CI -2.11 to -0.03, P = .044.
- A significant empathic communication by time interaction for pain intensity was observed: B = -0.78, 95% CI -1.45 to -0.12, P = .022.
- Pain intensity decreased 0.47 points over 6 weeks for patients with low-empathy therapists (bottom quartile, response rate 51% or below) versus 1.42 points for those with high-empathy therapists (top quartile, response rate 91% or above).
- Empathic communication was moderately associated with patient positive affect (r = 0.48, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67, P < .001) and weakly associated with therapeutic alliance (r = 0.26, 95% CI 0.054 to 0.45, P = .013).
- No significant associations were found between empathic communication and patient negative affect, exercise adherence, or attendance (P > .05).
- Empathic communication frequency was not predicted by physical therapist clinical experience (rho = -0.13, P = .49) or patient symptom chronicity (rho = -0.04, P = .82).
Limitations
- Small, convenience sample of 8 physical therapists and 31 patients at a single clinic, limiting generalizability.
- Observational design cannot establish causation - differences in treatment approaches between therapists may covary with communication style and independently affect outcomes.
- Patient sample had low baseline pain and no mood disorders, which is uncharacteristic of high-impact chronic pain populations; effects may differ in more severely affected groups.
- Audio-only recordings could not capture non-verbal empathic behaviors such as facial expressions and therapeutic touch, and did not cover all treatment visits.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain may benefit from choosing or requesting care from physical therapists who actively acknowledge their emotional concerns during treatment.
- For clinicians
- Physical therapists should be aware that empathic responsiveness to patient emotions - regardless of years of experience - may meaningfully improve pain outcomes, suggesting that targeted communication training could be valuable.
- For readers
- This is the first longitudinal study linking observed empathic communication behavior by physical therapists to patient pain outcomes, supporting the case for integrating communication skills training into pain rehabilitation.
Source
doi:10.1093/ptj/pzag001
Read the original paperMore General Musculoskeletal studies
- Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in adolescent elite athletesPrimary study
- Calf strains in athletes: a narrative review of management, injury grading, and return to sportNarrative review
- Neuroimmune interactions in musculoskeletal conditions: an introduction for cliniciansPrimary study
- Screening psychological factors in pelvic pain: validation of the Pelvic Pain Psychological Screening Questionnaire (3PSQ)Primary study
- Clinical presentation and rehabilitation progression following hamstring injury assessed by BAMIC in elite track and fieldPrimary study
- The broken wing sign: a new clinical test to detect gluteus medius pathology with and without fatty infiltrationPrimary study