PhysioHub

Isolated, full-thickness proximal rectus femoris injury in competitive athletes

The takeaway

Can athletes with a complete proximal rectus femoris tear return to their sport, and does surgery give better results than conservative management?

Nearly all competitive athletes with a full-thickness proximal rectus femoris injury returned to sport at their pre-injury level, regardless of treatment. Surgically treated athletes had a 100% return-to-play rate but took roughly twice as long to return compared with those managed conservatively.

DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study18 Trials132 ParticipantsLimited evidence

Key points

  1. Soccer players accounted for 70.5% of cases, with kicking and forced hip extension/knee flexion the most frequent injury mechanisms
  2. 86% of injuries were proximal avulsions; 80.3% of athletes underwent operative repair
  3. Operatively treated athletes achieved 100% return to play vs 93.3% for conservatively managed athletes
  4. Mean return-to-play time was 22.1 weeks after surgery and 11.7 weeks after conservative management
  5. Complications occurred in 18% of surgically treated athletes, mainly lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neurapraxia, vs 7.7% recurrent pain in conservatively managed athletes

How it was conducted

Design
Systematic review (PRISMA 2020); Level of evidence 4
Studies included
18 articles meeting inclusion criteria, drawn from 132 initially identified
Participants
132 competitive athletes, mean age 24.0 +/- 5.4 years (range 12-43), 94% male
Sports represented
Soccer 70.5%, rugby 15.2%, American football 12.1%
Injury types included
Isolated full-thickness proximal rectus femoris tears or bony avulsions during sporting activity, confirmed on clinical and imaging evaluation
Study quality
Mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score 34.8 (range 24-59), classified as poor; all included studies were level 3-5 evidence

What they found

  • Return-to-play rate: 100% (106/106) in operatively treated athletes vs 93.3% (14/15) in nonoperatively treated athletes
  • Mean return-to-play time: 22.1 weeks (range 14.0-37.6 weeks) after operative management vs 11.7 weeks (range 5.5-15.2 weeks) after nonoperative management
  • 86% of athletes (114/132) sustained proximal avulsion injuries; 8 had musculotendinous junction ruptures; 10 had bony avulsion fractures
  • Operative management was performed in 80.3% of athletes (106/132); nonoperative in 19.7% (26/132)
  • Complications in operative group: 18% (19/106), including LFCN neurapraxia (8 athletes), LFCN injury (4 athletes), recurrent injury (4%), hematoma (1 athlete)
  • Complications in nonoperative group: 7.7% (2/26), limited to recurrent pain
  • Kicking was the most common mechanism (47.6%; 30/63 athletes with reported mechanism), followed by excessive knee flexion/forced hip extension (42.9%; 27/63) and sprinting (9.5%; 6/63)
  • Mean follow-up: 21.4 +/- 11.4 months (range 1.5-48 months)

Limitations

  • All 18 included studies were small case series or retrospective reviews (level 3-5 evidence) with a mean poor MCMS quality score of 34.8, severely limiting generalizability
  • No prospective randomized controlled trials exist comparing operative and nonoperative treatment, so surgical indications rest on expert opinion rather than objective criteria
  • Strong selection bias toward reporting surgical cases makes direct comparison between treatment groups unreliable
  • Heterogeneous outcome measures and small nonoperative cohort (n=26) prevented meaningful statistical comparison between management strategies

Why it matters

For patients
Athletes who completely tear the proximal rectus femoris tendon have a high chance of returning to their sport whether treated with surgery or rehabilitation, though surgery involves a longer recovery of roughly five to six months.
For clinicians
Operative repair achieved 100% return to play versus 93.3% with conservative care, but with double the recovery time and an 18% complication rate; in the absence of RCTs, surgical indications should be weighed on a case-by-case basis using MRI severity, degree of retraction, and athlete goals.
For readers
This review provides the best available summary of a rare but serious sports injury, though all source data come from small, low-quality case series, so individual results may vary considerably.

Source

doi:10.1177/23259671221144984

Read the original paper

More General Musculoskeletal studies