"Every patient teaches you something new": experiences of physiotherapists delivering cognitive functional therapy
The upshot
What do physiotherapists experience when delivering cognitive functional therapy (CFT) for chronic disabling low back pain in a randomised controlled trial?
Physiotherapists delivering CFT in the RESTORE RCT described the experience as being a probationary driver, feeling newly competent while still refining skills. They reported transformational patient outcomes, ongoing challenges navigating psychosocial complexity, and tension between individualised care and trial demands.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study15 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Physiotherapists described four themes: sharing patient transformational change, refining new competencies, navigating patient complexity, and balancing care with trial processes.
- Each patient encounter was seen as a learning opportunity, deepening skills in person-centred communication and collaborative goal-setting.
- Complex patients with high disability, comorbidities, or diverse cultural backgrounds stretched physiotherapists beyond their perceived scope of practice.
- Ongoing access to a trainer and trial psychologist was valued for managing difficult cases, though not all physiotherapists felt they needed it.
- Biofeedback movement sensors were seen by most as interrupting clinical flow, consistent with trial results showing sensors did not add value.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Cross-sectional qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis, nested within the RESTORE RCT
- Participants
- 15 physiotherapists (7 female) who delivered CFT in the RESTORE RCT across Perth and Sydney, Australia; 3-25 years clinical experience
- Data collection
- Semi-structured interviews conducted 6-12 months after commencing CFT delivery in the trial; duration 52-220 min, mean 89 min
- Analysis
- Reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke) with iterative coding and team-based theme refinement
- CFT training
- Physiotherapists completed 80+ hours of competency-based training with experiential learning before trial commencement
What they found
- 15 of 15 eligible physiotherapists participated (3 of 18 original trainees withdrew before the delivery phase due to maternity leave, carer responsibilities, or ceasing physiotherapy practice).
- Mean Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score for RESTORE trial patients was 13.5 (SD 5.2), indicating high disability.
- 93% of CFT-only and 88% of CFT plus biofeedback group patients were classified as medium-high risk of poor outcome on the Keele STarT MSK screening tool.
- Four themes were constructed: sharing the journey of transformational change, refining new competencies, navigating patient complexity, and balancing patient care with trial-related processes.
- Most physiotherapists reported high reward from witnessing patient transformational change and re-engagement with valued activities.
- One physiotherapist reported ongoing discomfort addressing emotional and psychosocial factors throughout the trial.
Limitations
- All physiotherapists were recruited from private practices in Australian urban settings, limiting transferability to rural, regional, or public healthcare contexts.
- Physiotherapists self-selected into the RESTORE trial and had a prior interest in biopsychosocial approaches, which may not represent typical physiotherapy practice.
- The study does not include patient perspectives, so the reported transformations are filtered through therapist accounts only.
- Interviews were conducted by a physiotherapist known to participants from a prior training study, which may have introduced social desirability bias.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients with chronic disabling low back pain may benefit most from a physiotherapist who approaches their care collaboratively and has ongoing mentoring support, as therapist skill in CFT continues to develop through real clinical experience.
- For clinicians
- Physiotherapists transitioning to biopsychosocial practice need more than initial competency training, they benefit from ongoing experiential learning, peer support, and access to multidisciplinary colleagues for complex cases.
- For readers
- This study shows that even well-trained physiotherapists delivering an evidence-based intervention continue to refine their skills on the job, and that trial design factors like sensor use and administrative burden can detract from care quality.
Source
doi:10.1080/09638288.2024.2420836
Read the original paperMore General Musculoskeletal studies
- Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in adolescent elite athletesPrimary study
- More frequent empathic communication by physical therapists is associated with improved outcomes for low-impact chronic painPrimary study
- Calf strains in athletes: a narrative review of management, injury grading, and return to sportNarrative review
- Neuroimmune interactions in musculoskeletal conditions: an introduction for cliniciansPrimary study
- Screening psychological factors in pelvic pain: validation of the Pelvic Pain Psychological Screening Questionnaire (3PSQ)Primary study
- Clinical presentation and rehabilitation progression following hamstring injury assessed by BAMIC in elite track and fieldPrimary study