Effect of a 6-week weighted baseball throwing program on pitch velocity, pitching arm biomechanics, passive range of motion, and injury rates
In short
Does a 6-week weighted-baseball throwing program safely increase pitch velocity in young pitchers?
A 6-week weighted-ball throwing program produced a small but significant gain in pitch velocity, but it also increased shoulder external rotation motion and was linked to a 24% elbow injury rate, while the control group had no injuries. The velocity benefit comes with a real safety cost.
Mixed pictureRead paper
Primary study38 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- Pitch velocity rose about 3.3% (roughly 1 m/s) in the weighted-ball group, a statistically significant increase
- 24% of the weighted-ball group (4 of the training group) sustained elbow injuries, while no control pitchers were injured
- The weighted-ball group gained 4.3 degrees of shoulder external rotation range of motion, a change linked to the velocity gain
- This was a Level 1 randomized controlled trial in pitchers aged 13 to 18, but the sample was very small
- Authors urge caution despite the velocity benefit because of the notable injury rate
How it was conducted
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial, Level 1 evidence
- Participants
- 38 healthy baseball pitchers aged 13 to 18 years (mean 15.3 years)
- Groups
- Training group (n=19) doing a 6-week weighted-ball program 3 times per week with 2 to 32 ounce balls, vs control group (n=19) using only a 5-ounce regulation ball; both did strength training
- Outcomes
- Pitch velocity, shoulder and elbow passive range of motion, shoulder strength, elbow varus torque, arm angular velocity, and injury rates
- Analysis
- 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA at P < 0.05; injuries tracked through training and the following season
What they found
- Training group pitch velocity rose from 29.9 +/- 1.5 to 30.9 +/- 1.5 m/s, a 1.0 m/s (3.3%) increase (post hoc P < 0.001; two-way P = 0.06)
- Dominant shoulder external rotation increased 4.3 degrees in the training group (post hoc P = 0.01; two-way P = 0.02), rising from 137.2 +/- 2.7 to 141.9 +/- 2.7 degrees
- No significant differences in elbow varus torque (training +2.3 N.m, P = 0.35) or arm angular velocity (training -111.6 deg/s, P = 0.37)
- 4 of the training group (24%) sustained elbow injuries: 2 olecranon stress fractures, 1 partial UCL injury, and 1 UCL injury needing surgical reconstruction (player retired); no control group injuries
- Control group showed a significant post hoc gain of 12.8 N in dominant shoulder external rotation strength (P = 0.003); two-way comparison not significant (P = 0.19)
- 80% of the training group increased pitch velocity and 12% decreased; 67% of the control group also increased
Limitations
- Very small sample size, with only 34 of 38 completing testing and 4 training-group dropouts
- Control group throwing was not directly supervised
- Restricted to ages 13 to 18, limiting generalizability to older or professional pitchers
- Short 6-week intervention with injury follow-up only through the subsequent season
Why it matters
- For patients
- If you are a young pitcher considering weighted-ball training to throw harder, weigh the modest velocity gain against a meaningful risk of elbow injury.
- For clinicians
- Counsel adolescent pitchers and families that weighted-ball programs can raise velocity but carry a notable injury risk and increase shoulder external rotation motion, so monitor arm health closely.
- For readers
- This Level 1 trial shows weighted-ball training is a trade-off, offering small velocity gains alongside a 24% injury rate in trained youth pitchers.
Source
doi:10.1177/1941738118779909
Read the original paperMore General Musculoskeletal studies
- Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in adolescent elite athletesPrimary study
- More frequent empathic communication by physical therapists is associated with improved outcomes for low-impact chronic painPrimary study
- Calf strains in athletes: a narrative review of management, injury grading, and return to sportNarrative review
- Neuroimmune interactions in musculoskeletal conditions: an introduction for cliniciansPrimary study
- Screening psychological factors in pelvic pain: validation of the Pelvic Pain Psychological Screening Questionnaire (3PSQ)Primary study
- Clinical presentation and rehabilitation progression following hamstring injury assessed by BAMIC in elite track and fieldPrimary study