Early versus delayed lengthening exercises for acute hamstring injury in male athletes: a randomised controlled clinical trial
In short
For male athletes with an acute hamstring injury, does starting eccentric lengthening exercises on day one of rehabilitation lead to a faster return to sport compared with waiting until later in the programme?
Starting lengthening (eccentric) exercises from day one of hamstring rehabilitation did not reduce return-to-sport time or reinjury rates compared with delaying them until athletes could run at 70% of maximal speed. Early introduction appears safe, but offers no measurable advantage over a delayed start.
ChallengesRead paper
RCT88 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- Median return to sport was 23 days (early group) versus 33 days (delayed group), but this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.60, p=0.84).
- Reinjury rates were similar at all follow-up points: 8.3-8.8% within 2 months, 3.2-6.2% at 2-6 months, and 3.4-5.9% at 6-12 months for both groups.
- The early lengthening group had significantly greater eccentric strength at return to sport (198 Nm vs 182 Nm at 60 degrees/s, p=0.029), though this isolated finding should be interpreted with caution.
- The trial was underpowered due to a higher-than-expected loss to follow-up (19% vs anticipated 10%), meaning a clinically relevant benefit of up to 14 days cannot be ruled out.
- Both protocols were safe; pain exacerbation rates during rehabilitation were not significantly different between groups.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Single-centre parallel-group randomised controlled superiority trial (Aspetar Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Participants
- 90 male athletes aged 18-36 (median 26 years) with MRI-confirmed grade I-II acute hamstring injury; predominantly professional football players
- Groups
- Early lengthening (n=44): Askling lengthening exercises introduced on day 1 of rehabilitation. Delayed lengthening (n=44): same exercises introduced only after athlete could run at >70% self-rated maximal speed
- Primary outcome
- Days from injury to full unrestricted training and/or match play
- Secondary outcome
- Reinjury rate within 2, 6, and 12 months after return to sport
- Follow-up
- 12 months post return to sport; recruitment March 2014 to December 2018
What they found
- Median return to sport: 23 days (IQR 16-35) early lengthening vs 33 days (IQR 23-40) delayed lengthening; median difference 8 days (95% CI 0 to 14), Cohen's d=0.39.
- Adjusted Cox regression HR for early vs delayed lengthening: 0.95 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.60, p=0.84) - no significant difference.
- Unadjusted Cox regression HR: 1.15 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.84, p=0.57).
- Sensitivity analysis adjusted HR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.37, p=0.44).
- Reinjury within 2 months: 3/36 (8.3%) early vs 3/34 (8.8%) delayed; OR=0.94 (95% CI 0.18 to 5.0, p=0.94).
- Reinjury 2-6 months: 1/31 (3.2%) early vs 2/32 (6.2%) delayed; OR=2.00 (95% CI 0.17 to 23.3, p=0.58).
- Reinjury 6-12 months: 2/34 (5.9%) early vs 1/29 (3.4%) delayed; OR=0.57 (95% CI 0.05 to 6.6, p=0.66).
- Eccentric isokinetic strength at 60 degrees/s at return to sport: 198 Nm (IQR 175-241) early vs 182 Nm (IQR 149-201) delayed (p=0.029).
- Median days from injury to first lengthening exercise: 5 days (IQR 3-6) early group vs 16 days (IQR 11-23) delayed group.
Limitations
- Loss to follow-up was 19%, higher than the anticipated 10%, leaving the study potentially underpowered to detect the observed 8-day median difference.
- Only male athletes from a single sports medicine centre in Qatar were studied, limiting generalisability to female athletes and other settings.
- Treating physiotherapists could not be blinded to group allocation, introducing possible bias in rehabilitation progression decisions.
- Reinjuries were not systematically confirmed by MRI, so the exact location and severity of reinjuries was not always known.
Why it matters
- For patients
- An athlete recovering from a hamstring strain can expect a similar recovery timeline regardless of whether their physiotherapist starts eccentric loading exercises immediately or waits until they can run comfortably - both approaches are safe.
- For clinicians
- Clinicians have flexibility in when to introduce Askling-style lengthening exercises during hamstring rehabilitation; early introduction does not accelerate return to sport but also carries no additional risk of reinjury.
- For readers
- This well-designed RCT closes a specific gap in hamstring rehabilitation evidence, confirming that the timing of eccentric lengthening exercise introduction is less important than including such exercises at some point in the programme.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103405
Read the original paperMore General Musculoskeletal studies
- Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in adolescent elite athletesPrimary study
- More frequent empathic communication by physical therapists is associated with improved outcomes for low-impact chronic painPrimary study
- Calf strains in athletes: a narrative review of management, injury grading, and return to sportNarrative review
- Neuroimmune interactions in musculoskeletal conditions: an introduction for cliniciansPrimary study
- Screening psychological factors in pelvic pain: validation of the Pelvic Pain Psychological Screening Questionnaire (3PSQ)Primary study
- Clinical presentation and rehabilitation progression following hamstring injury assessed by BAMIC in elite track and fieldPrimary study