Who will redislocate his/her shoulder? Predicting recurrent instability following a first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation
Our take
After a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation, which patients are most likely to dislocate again within a year?
A multivariate tool combining six physical and psychosocial factors, including bony Bankart lesion, age 16-25 years, dominant shoulder involvement, lack of immobilisation, higher pain/disability scores, and higher fear of reinjury, can predict recurrent shoulder instability within 12 months of a first dislocation. About 36% of patients in this New Zealand cohort had at least one repeat instability event within a year.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study128 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- 36% (46/128) of participants had recurrent shoulder instability within 12 months
- Six independent predictors were identified: bony Bankart lesion, age 16-25, dominant shoulder affected, no sling immobilisation, higher pain and disability (SPADI), and higher fear of reinjury (TSK-11)
- Being immobilised in a sling was protective against recurrence (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.86)
- Bony Bankart lesion carried the highest individual risk (OR 6.04 in multivariate model)
- This was the first prospective study to link fear of reinjury and self-reported pain with actual recurrence rates
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective cohort study
- Participants
- 128 adults aged 16-40 years with a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in New Zealand, recruited via Accident Compensation Corporation records May 2015 to February 2016
- Follow-up
- Telephone follow-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by research assistants blinded to baseline variables
- Primary outcome
- Recurrent shoulder instability (subluxation or dislocation) within 12 months
- Analysis
- Univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate backwards stepwise logistic regression to develop predictive equation
- Baseline variables
- Demographics, radiology findings (bony Bankart, Hill-Sachs, greater tuberosity fracture), immobilisation, physiotherapy, and validated questionnaires (SPADI, SAS, TSK-11, WOSI)
What they found
- Recurrence rate at 12 months: 35.9% (46/128); 50.0% (64/128) had no recurrence; 14.1% (18/128) lost to follow-up
- Bony Bankart lesion: univariate OR 3.65 (95% CI 1.05 to 12.70, p=0.04); multivariate OR 6.04 (95% CI 1.40 to 26.06, p=0.016)
- Age 16-25 vs other: multivariate OR 2.89 (95% CI 1.12 to 7.44, p=0.028)
- Dominant shoulder affected: multivariate OR 2.23 (95% CI 0.92 to 5.42, p=0.077)
- Immobilisation in sling: multivariate OR 0.28 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.86, p=0.026), i.e., protective
- SPADI total score: multivariate OR 1.034 per point (95% CI 1.003 to 1.066, p=0.031)
- TSK-11 fear of reinjury score: multivariate OR 1.14 per point (95% CI 0.994 to 1.313, p=0.061)
- Multivariate predictive equation: Risk = -4.73 + 1.06*(age 16-25) + 1.80*(bony Bankart) + 0.80*(dominant side) - 1.27*(immobilised) + 0.03*(SPADI total) + 0.13*(TSK-11 total)
- Hill-Sachs lesion was not significantly associated with recurrence: OR 1.45 (95% CI 0.63 to 3.35, p=0.38)
- Gender was not significantly associated with recurrence in multivariate analysis
- Highest recurrence rates were in contact/collision sports: rugby union, football, towed water sports, and skateboarding all had recurrence rates of 50% or above
Limitations
- Recurrent instability outcome was self-reported and not confirmed by radiograph, which may have introduced reporting bias and inflated psychosocial variable correlations
- The study was not sufficiently powered to examine some subgroup associations, such as greater tuberosity fractures and limb dominance effects independently
- Radiological reporting of bony lesion size and characteristics was inconsistent across radiologists, preventing more detailed analysis of Hill-Sachs and bony Bankart lesion severity
- The predictive tool has not yet been validated in an independent population, so its true predictive accuracy is unknown
Why it matters
- For patients
- If you are aged 16-25, had a bony Bankart fracture on imaging, dislocated your dominant shoulder, were not immobilised in a sling, and have high pain levels or fear of reinjury, you are at substantially higher risk of dislocating again and should discuss this with your clinician.
- For clinicians
- This six-factor multivariate tool enables individualised risk stratification at first presentation, supporting shared decision-making about conservative versus surgical management after a first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.
- For readers
- This is the first prospective study to confirm that psychosocial factors such as fear of reinjury and self-reported pain independently predict actual recurrence, broadening the picture beyond purely anatomical risk factors.
Source
doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000447
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the shoulder special tests.
More Shoulder studies
- Does physical activity provide additional benefit in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?Primary study
- Arthroscopic subacromial decompression vs placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10-year FIMPACT RCTRCT
- Comparison of 1- and 3-week immobilization following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization: a prospective studyCohort study
- Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy studyPrimary study
- Relationship between tendon tissue and shoulder disability change during an 8-week exercise intervention for rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational studyPrimary study
- Mobilization with movement plus exercise versus exercise alone for central sensitization in chronic subacromial pain syndrome: a sham-controlled RCTRCT