Relationship between tendon tissue and shoulder disability change during an 8-week exercise intervention for rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational study
The short answer
Does tendon tissue change during an exercise program, and do those changes explain shoulder disability improvement in people with rotator cuff tendinopathy?
An 8-week resistive exercise program significantly improved shoulder disability and reduced tendon thickness, but only the early reduction in tendon thickness (at 2 weeks) was linked to disability improvement. Internal tendon architecture did not change, suggesting tendon structure is at most a partial, early-phase explanation for recovery.
Mixed pictureRead paper
Primary study47 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Shoulder disability (Penn Score) improved significantly at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, reaching a clinically meaningful difference only at week 8 (mean +17.4 points).
- Tendon thickness decreased significantly at all time points but changes were smaller than the minimal detectable change of 0.3 mm.
- A 1-mm decrease in tendon thickness at week 2 was associated with a 14.4-point improvement in the Penn Score (p=0.015), but this relationship was not present at weeks 4 or 8.
- Internal tendon architecture (peak spatial frequency radius) did not change significantly at any time point over 8 weeks.
- Lower baseline Penn Score was the strongest predictor of greater improvement, consistent with regression-to-the-mean effects.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective longitudinal observational cohort study
- Participants
- 47 adults (age 18-55) with unilateral rotator cuff tendinopathy confirmed by 3 of 5 positive clinical tests and symptoms for at least 3 months
- Intervention
- 8-week progressive resistive exercise program, 5 sessions per week, with twice-weekly supervision by a licensed physical therapist
- Primary outcomes
- Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (patient-reported disability), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and internal tendon architecture (peak spatial frequency radius) via ultrasound at baseline, 2, 4, and 8 weeks
- Analysis
- Linear mixed-effects models with participant-level random intercept; leave-one-out cross-validation for predictive accuracy
What they found
- Penn Score improved from baseline: +6.3 points (SE=1.2, p<0.001) at week 2, +11.2 points (SE=1.2, p<0.001) at week 4, and +17.4 points (SE=1.2, p<0.001) at week 8; minimum clinically important difference of 11.4 points was reached only at week 8.
- Tendon thickness decreased significantly: -0.09 mm (SE=0.03, p<0.001) at week 2, -0.16 mm (SE=0.03, p<0.001) at week 4, and -0.20 mm (SE=0.03, p<0.001) at week 8; all changes were below the MDC of 0.3 mm.
- Internal tendon architecture (PSFR) did not change significantly at any time point.
- For every 1-mm decrease in tendon thickness at week 2, the Penn Score increased by 14.44 points (SE=5.88, p=0.015); RMSE=5.6 points.
- Tendon thickness and PSFR changes were not significantly associated with Penn Score changes at weeks 4 and 8 (week 4 thickness: estimate=12.09, p=0.11; week 8 thickness: estimate=2.17, p=0.73).
- Baseline Penn Score was a significant predictor of change: lower baseline scores predicted greater improvement (estimate=-0.17, SE=0.06, p=0.004).
- Model R for the involved-side model was 0.17, indicating it explained a small proportion of variance in Penn Score changes.
- Bilateral tendon thickness difference models showed no significant interactions or main effects for tendon variables.
- Exercise adherence was high: mean 3 missed sessions (SD=3.3) out of 40 total sessions; 40 of 47 participants completed all visits.
Limitations
- Single-cohort design with no control group limits ability to determine whether tendon changes drive clinical improvement or are an unrelated consequence of exercise.
- Only one intervention (resistive exercise) was studied, so findings may not generalise to other treatments such as corticosteroid injection or shockwave therapy.
- The sensitivity of the peak spatial frequency radius to detect small architectural changes over 8 weeks is not well established, so real tissue changes may have been missed.
- No measures of systemic inflammatory markers (e.g., interleukin-6, TNF-alpha) were collected, leaving open the role of systemic inflammation in outcomes.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Most people with rotator cuff tendinopathy can expect meaningful shoulder pain and function improvement from an 8-week exercise program, though the tendon itself changes only modestly during this time.
- For clinicians
- Tendon thickness reduction at 2 weeks may be a useful early signal of response, but tendon morphology alone explains very little of the overall disability change and should not be the primary treatment target.
- For readers
- This study fills a gap by linking ultrasound tendon changes to patient outcomes over time, and points to the need for studies that also measure neuromuscular, sensorimotor, and systemic inflammatory factors.
Source
doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaf107
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the shoulder special tests.
More Shoulder studies
- Does physical activity provide additional benefit in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?Primary study
- Arthroscopic subacromial decompression vs placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10-year FIMPACT RCTRCT
- Comparison of 1- and 3-week immobilization following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization: a prospective studyCohort study
- Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy studyPrimary study
- Mobilization with movement plus exercise versus exercise alone for central sensitization in chronic subacromial pain syndrome: a sham-controlled RCTRCT
- Prognostic value of baseline muscle strength for functional recovery after rotator cuff repair: an observational studyPrimary study