Tolerance and effectiveness of eccentric vs. concentric muscle strengthening in rotator cuff partial tears and moderate to severe shoulder pain. A randomized pilot study
The verdict
Is eccentric strengthening better tolerated and more effective than concentric strengthening for people with partial rotator cuff tears and moderate to severe shoulder pain?
Both eccentric and concentric strengthening were well tolerated (96% tolerance rate) and improved pain, function, and tendon structure in patients with partial rotator cuff tears. Eccentric exercise showed faster gains in function, strength, and tendon healing at 1 and 3 months, but differences largely disappeared by 12 months.
Mixed pictureRead paper
Primary study26 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Both exercise types achieved a 96% tolerance rate even in patients with moderate to severe pain at baseline.
- Eccentric training produced significantly greater improvements in Constant scale function scores at 1 month (p = 0.003) and 3 months (p = 0.004) compared with concentric training.
- Eccentric training showed significantly greater strength gains at 3 months (p = 0.01); no significant between-group difference remained at 12 months.
- Tendon structure (ultrasound) improved more in the eccentric group at 3 months (p = 0.05) and 12 months (p = 0.043).
- Pain (VAS) improved significantly within both groups over 12 months, but no statistically significant between-group difference was found at any time point.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Pilot randomized controlled trial, single-centre outpatient setting
- Participants
- 26 adults (median age 54-54.5 years) with ultrasound-confirmed partial rotator cuff tear and VAS pain >=50 mm, no prior treatment
- Groups
- Eccentric strengthening (n=12) vs. concentric strengthening (n=14); both groups also received heat, massage, and range-of-motion therapy
- Duration
- 20 supervised sessions over 4 weeks, then home program to 12 months
- Primary outcomes
- Tolerance rate, VAS pain, Constant-Murley scale, normalised shoulder strength (dynamometer), ultrasound tendon structure
- Follow-up
- Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months
What they found
- Tolerance rate: 96% in both groups overall (eccentric 92%, concentric 100%); one patient withdrew at week 2 due to worsening pain.
- VAS (mm) - eccentric group medians: 55 at baseline, 30 at 1 month, 30 at 3 months, 10 at 12 months (intra-group p < 0.001).
- VAS (mm) - concentric group medians: 50 at baseline, 30 at 1 month, 30 at 3 months, 5 at 12 months (intra-group p = 0.01); no significant inter-group difference at any time point (12-month p = 0.83).
- Constant scale (points) - eccentric: 58.5 baseline, 88 at 1 month, 93 at 3 months, 85 at 12 months (p < 0.001 intra-group); concentric: 50 baseline, 62 at 1 month, 80 at 3 months, 91.5 at 12 months (p = 0.038 intra-group); inter-group differences at 1 month (p = 0.003) and 3 months (p = 0.004).
- Normalised strength (kg/body weight) - eccentric: 0.23, 0.29, 0.73, 0.72 at baseline/1/3/12 months (p = 0.001); concentric: 0.24, 0.21, 0.54, 0.66 (p = 0.01); inter-group differences at 3 months (p = 0.01); no significant difference at 12 months (p = 0.122).
- Ultrasound at 3 months: eccentric group had 50% tendinosis and 34% normal; concentric group had 42% still partial tears and only 14% normal (inter-group p = 0.05).
- Ultrasound at 12 months: eccentric group had 33% tendinosis and 58% normal; concentric group had 28% partial tears and 35% normal (inter-group p = 0.043).
Limitations
- Small pilot sample (n=26) with convenience sampling; the study was underpowered to detect many between-group differences, particularly for pain.
- Predominantly female sample (10/12 eccentric, 13/14 concentric), limiting generalisability; strength analysis was performed only in women.
- Home-program compliance relied on patient self-report with monthly phone reminders, not objective monitoring.
- No sham or usual-care-only control arm; both groups received identical adjunct therapy, so the specific contribution of contraction type cannot be fully isolated.
Why it matters
- For patients
- People with partial rotator cuff tears and significant pain can safely start lightweight strengthening early in rehabilitation; eccentric exercises may speed up recovery of shoulder function and promote tendon healing faster than standard concentric exercises.
- For clinicians
- Eccentric strengthening produced faster functional gains (Constant scale) and better ultrasound tendon healing at 3 and 12 months compared with concentric training in this pilot RCT, supporting its use as a preferred technique in conservative management of partial rotator cuff tears, though a larger trial is needed to confirm superiority.
- For readers
- This small pilot study suggests eccentric exercise is at least as safe as conventional concentric exercise for painful partial rotator cuff tears and may offer an advantage for earlier recovery, but the evidence remains preliminary due to the small sample size.
Source
doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2020.07.031
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the shoulder special tests.
More Shoulder studies
- Does physical activity provide additional benefit in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?Primary study
- Arthroscopic subacromial decompression vs placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10-year FIMPACT RCTRCT
- Comparison of 1- and 3-week immobilization following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization: a prospective studyCohort study
- Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy studyPrimary study
- Relationship between tendon tissue and shoulder disability change during an 8-week exercise intervention for rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational studyPrimary study
- Mobilization with movement plus exercise versus exercise alone for central sensitization in chronic subacromial pain syndrome: a sham-controlled RCTRCT