Partial thickness rotator cuff tear by itself does not cause shoulder pain or muscle weakness in baseball players
Our take
Does a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear by itself cause shoulder pain or muscle weakness in baseball players?
Articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears did not independently cause shoulder pain or muscle weakness in university baseball players. Shoulder pain was more strongly linked to scapular malposition, dyskinesis, and overall poor shoulder condition than to the presence of a tear.
ChallengesRead paper
Primary study87 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- 47% of 87 university baseball players had articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears on ultrasound, yet 83% of those with tears were pain-free
- Shoulder pain rates were similar between players with tears (17%) and those without tears (20%), with no statistically significant difference (P = .96)
- Muscle strength in abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation did not differ significantly between players with and without tears (P = .15 to .70)
- Shoulder pain was significantly associated with scapular malposition (P = .002), scapular dyskinesis (P = .04), and a poor Hara test score (P < .0001)
- The authors propose that many of these so-called rotator cuff tears are actually tears of the superior shoulder capsule at the greater tuberosity attachment, not true tendon tears
How it was conducted
- Design
- Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence 3
- Participants
- 87 male university baseball players (38 pitchers, 49 position players); mean age 19.5 years, mean throwing career 11.5 years
- Imaging
- Bilateral shoulder ultrasound by a single experienced surgeon; players allocated to 4 groups: no tear, supraspinatus tear, infraspinatus tear, or both
- Primary outcomes
- Current shoulder pain (questionnaire) and shoulder muscle strength (abduction, external rotation, internal rotation) measured with a handheld dynamometer
- Additional assessments
- Scapular malposition (scapula-spine distance), scapular dyskinesis, posterior shoulder tightness (horizontal flexion test), and total shoulder condition (Hara test)
- Statistical analysis
- Chi-square test for pain rates; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and unpaired t tests for muscle strength; significance threshold P < .05
What they found
- 47% (41 of 87) players had articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears in the dominant shoulder; 5% (4 players) had tears in the nondominant shoulder
- Tear depth was 4.6 +/- 2.3 mm in the supraspinatus and 6.2 +/- 3.6 mm in the infraspinatus
- Shoulder pain rate was 17% (7 of 41) in players with tears versus 20% (9 of 46) in players without tears; no significant difference (P = .76 for overall comparison; P = .96 reported in abstract)
- Muscle strength (dominant/nondominant %) did not differ significantly among all 4 groups in abduction (P = .70), external rotation (P = .15), or internal rotation (P = .15)
- Abduction strength was significantly greater in the dominant (affected) shoulder in players with isolated supraspinatus tears (P = .04) and combined supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears (P = .01), opposite to the expected direction of weakness
- Shoulder pain was significantly higher in players with scapular malposition: 38% (10 of 26) versus 10% (6 of 61) without malposition (P = .002)
- Shoulder pain was significantly higher with scapular dyskinesis: 35% (6 of 17) versus 14% (10 of 70) without dyskinesis (P = .04)
- Players with a poor Hara test score (0-7) had a shoulder pain rate of 63% (10 of 16) versus 8% (6 of 71) for those with a good score (P < .0001)
- Position players had significantly higher rates of shoulder pain and rotator cuff tears than pitchers (both P = .03)
- External rotation strength (dominant/nondominant %) was significantly lower in players with shoulder pain compared to those without pain (P = .03)
Limitations
- Single-team, university-level male baseball players only; findings may not generalise to high school, professional, or female athletes
- Muscle strength measured at only one position per direction, though intraobserver reliability was good (ICC 0.85 to 0.89)
- No non-throwing control athletes included; results cannot be applied to contact sport or overhead athletes from other sports
- Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference; the study cannot determine whether tears preceded or followed the observed shoulder conditions
Why it matters
- For patients
- If your imaging shows a partial rotator cuff tear and you are a throwing athlete, the tear alone may not be the source of your shoulder pain; addressing scapular control and shoulder mechanics through physiotherapy may be the most important first step.
- For clinicians
- Shoulder pain in overhead athletes should prompt assessment of scapular kinematics and overall shoulder condition rather than attribution of pain directly to a partial-thickness articular-sided tear; surgery targeting the tear alone may not resolve pain if underlying shoulder pathology is untreated.
- For readers
- This study challenges the assumption that imaging findings of partial rotator cuff tears automatically explain symptoms in athletes, reinforcing the need to interpret imaging in the full clinical context.
Source
doi:10.1177/0363546519878141
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the shoulder special tests.
More Shoulder studies
- Does physical activity provide additional benefit in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?Primary study
- Arthroscopic subacromial decompression vs placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10-year FIMPACT RCTRCT
- Comparison of 1- and 3-week immobilization following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization: a prospective studyCohort study
- Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy studyPrimary study
- Relationship between tendon tissue and shoulder disability change during an 8-week exercise intervention for rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational studyPrimary study
- Mobilization with movement plus exercise versus exercise alone for central sensitization in chronic subacromial pain syndrome: a sham-controlled RCTRCT