PhysioHub

Effects of bench press technique variations on musculoskeletal shoulder loads

In short

Which bench press technique adjustments reduce shoulder joint loads and potential injury risk?

Using a grip width narrower than 1.5 times the bi-acromial width and retracting the scapulae during the bench press reduces compression and shear forces in both the glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joints, potentially lowering the risk of rotator cuff injury, glenohumeral instability, and distal clavicular osteolysis. These findings are based on biomechanical modelling in a small lab sample and do not yet confirm actual injury rates.

SupportsRead paper
Primary study10 ParticipantsLimited evidence

Key points

  1. Grip widths below 1.5 bi-acromial widths (BAW) reduced acromioclavicular compression (p < 0.05), which may lower distal clavicular osteolysis risk
  2. Scapula retraction and grip width below 1.5 BAW both decreased glenohumeral posterior shear force and rotator cuff muscle activity (p < 0.05)
  3. Wide grips of 2 BAW produced the largest glenohumeral and acromioclavicular reaction forces, supporting a performance-injury trade-off
  4. Shoulder abduction angle had a smaller effect overall; a 45 degree angle increased glenohumeral superior shear force, relevant for those with subacromial pain
  5. Large individual differences in mediolateral hand force direction substantially affected shoulder loads and may relate to experience level

How it was conducted

Design
Experimental laboratory study with repeated-measures technique manipulation
Participants
10 experienced strength athletes (9 male, 1 female; mean age 27 +/- 3 years; mean bench press experience 6.7 +/- 3.9 years)
Technique variations
21 of 27 combinations of grip width (1, 1.5, 2 BAW), shoulder abduction angle (45, 70, 90 degrees), and scapula pose (neutral, retracted, released)
Load
16 kg barbell used to minimise fatigue and injury risk during testing
Measurement
Optoelectronic motion capture (100 Hz) and instrumented barbell for lateral forces; OpenSim musculoskeletal shoulder model for glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joint reaction forces
Statistics
Statistical non-parametric mapping (spm1d) with hierarchical two-level random effects analysis; significance threshold p < 0.05

What they found

  • Wide grip (2 BAW) significantly increased total glenohumeral reaction force, glenohumeral compression, glenohumeral posterior shear, total acromioclavicular reaction force, acromioclavicular compression, and acromioclavicular inferior shear compared to narrower grips, with the most significant increase occurring when widening from 1.5 to 2 BAW (p < 0.05)
  • Narrow grip (1 BAW) increased glenohumeral superior shear force component compared to 1.5 BAW (p < 0.05)
  • Scapula retraction versus neutral significantly decreased total glenohumeral reaction force, glenohumeral compression, glenohumeral posterior shear (around the lowest barbell point), acromioclavicular compression, and acromioclavicular inferior shear (p < 0.05); no differences were found between released and neutral scapulae
  • Peak rotator cuff activities were always smallest for the retracted scapulae condition across all technique components (exact values in Table 2 of the paper)
  • Supraspinatus and subscapularis peak activities were smaller for narrower grip widths, with the largest differences seen in supraspinatus anterior activity
  • A 45 degree shoulder abduction angle increased glenohumeral superior shear force compared to 70 degrees during the descending and ascending phases (p < 0.05)
  • Median mediolateral hand forces ranged from 15.1 +/- 58.1% to 35.7 +/- 58.7% of the vertical force component across conditions, with standard deviations up to 64%, indicating very large between-individual differences
  • In a supplementary simulation, lowest glenohumeral reaction forces were found with laterally directed hand forces of 50-100% of the vertical force component; lowest acromioclavicular forces at 100-150% lateral

Limitations

  • Small sample (n = 10) limits generalisability and statistical power
  • Biomechanical modelling cannot establish prospective injury risk; no clinical injury outcomes were recorded
  • Musculoskeletal model assumes minimum muscle activation and does not include ligaments, which may underestimate loads when stabiliser capacity is exceeded
  • Light testing load (16 kg) may not reflect forces at training or competition loads, and vertical barbell force was estimated rather than measured directly

Why it matters

For patients
Weightlifters or gym-goers with shoulder pain may reduce their load by switching to a grip narrower than 1.5 times shoulder width and actively squeezing their shoulder blades together during the bench press.
For clinicians
These biomechanical data provide the first model-based support for recommending a medium or narrow grip and continuous scapular retraction to reduce glenohumeral posterior shear and acromioclavicular compression, particularly for patients prone to rotator cuff problems or distal clavicular osteolysis.
For readers
This is the first study to use a musculoskeletal model to estimate individual joint forces during multiple bench press variations, offering a more mechanistic basis for technique recommendations than previous opinion-based guidelines.

Source

doi:10.3389/fphys.2024.1393235

Read the original paper
Clinically assessing this area? See the shoulder special tests.

More Shoulder studies