Comparison of treatments for frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The upshot
For frozen shoulder, is intra-articular corticosteroid (with or without added physiotherapy or home exercise) more effective than other nonsurgical treatments, placebo, or no treatment?
This large systematic review and network meta-analysis of nonsurgical frozen shoulder treatments found that intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid was the only intervention with both statistically and clinically meaningful superiority in the short-term for pain and function, with benefits that may last up to 6 months. Adding a simple home exercise program, and electrotherapy or mobilizations, may add modest mid-term benefit. By 6 months most treatments performed similarly, and the certainty of evidence was generally moderate at best.
Key points
- Intra-articular corticosteroid was the only treatment that beat both no treatment or placebo and physiotherapy with results that were clinically and not just statistically meaningful in the short-term.
- Its advantage was clearest for pain and function in the first weeks to 2 to 3 months and appeared to fade by 6 months, when most treatments looked similar.
- Adding arthrographic distension to the injection ranked best for short-term pain in the network analysis but the extra benefit over injection alone was clinically small.
- A simple home exercise program of range-of-motion exercises and stretches gave a clinically meaningful short-term pain benefit on its own.
- The authors recommend offering IA corticosteroid plus a home exercise program at first contact for frozen shoulder of less than 1 year duration, a step earlier than current NICE guidance.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized trials, following PRISMA; random-effects models and trial sequential analysis (TSA); GRADE for certainty
- Search
- Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL searched February 2020; randomized designs comparing treatments for frozen shoulder with other treatments, placebo, or no treatment
- Intervention
- All nonsurgical modalities including IA and subacromial corticosteroid, physiotherapy, home exercise, arthrographic distension, acupuncture, ESWT, oral corticosteroid
- Outcomes
- Primary outcomes pain (mean difference on VAS) and function (standardized mean difference); secondary outcome external rotation range of movement; follow-up split into short, mid, and long term
- Analysis
- 65 studies in qualitative synthesis, 34 in pairwise meta-analyses, 39 in network meta-analyses; MCRD set at 1 VAS point for pain, effect size 0.45 for function, 10 degrees for ER ROM
What they found
- 65 eligible studies with 4097 participants; 34 studies (2402 participants) in pairwise and 39 studies (2736 participants) in network meta-analyses.
- IA corticosteroid vs no treatment or placebo, short-term pain: MD -1.0 VAS point (95% CI -1.5 to -0.5; P < .001) and function SMD 0.6 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9; P < .001), both clinically and statistically significant.
- IA corticosteroid vs physiotherapy, late short-term pain: MD -1.1 VAS points (95% CI -1.7 to -0.5; P < .001).
- Mid-term, IA corticosteroid plus home exercise vs no treatment or placebo pain: MD -1.4 VAS points (95% CI -1.8 to -1.1; P < .001); home exercise alone vs no treatment was also clinically and statistically significant.
- TSA confirmed the benefit of IA corticosteroid vs placebo for early and late short-term pain (ruling out a type I error) but did not confirm it vs physiotherapy, suggesting more trials are needed there.
- In the network analysis, arthrographic distension plus IA corticosteroid had the highest probability of being best for late short-term pain (96%), with IA corticosteroid second (85%).
Limitations
- Frozen shoulder of all stages and chronicity was analyzed together, so the best treatment for a specific stage could not be determined.
- Home exercise programs varied in frequency, intensity, and duration but were not adjusted for in comparisons.
- Diverse physiotherapy modalities were grouped and analyzed together despite likely differing effectiveness.
- Certainty of evidence was moderate at best for the key corticosteroid comparisons, and long-term (beyond 12 months) data were insufficient to analyze.
Why it matters
- For patients
- If you have frozen shoulder that started within the past year, a corticosteroid injection plus simple home stretches may ease pain and improve movement faster than other options in the first few months.
- For clinicians
- Consider offering IA corticosteroid with a home exercise program at first contact rather than reserving it for treatment failures, while counseling that the advantage is mainly short-term and largely evens out by 6 months.
- For readers
- This is the largest meta-analysis in the field and supports early corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder, though benefits are short-lived and the evidence is moderate, not definitive.
Source
doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29581
Read the original paperMore Shoulder studies
- Does physical activity provide additional benefit in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?Primary study
- Arthroscopic subacromial decompression vs placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10-year FIMPACT RCTRCT
- Comparison of 1- and 3-week immobilization following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization: a prospective studyCohort study
- Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy studyPrimary study
- Relationship between tendon tissue and shoulder disability change during an 8-week exercise intervention for rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational studyPrimary study
- Mobilization with movement plus exercise versus exercise alone for central sensitization in chronic subacromial pain syndrome: a sham-controlled RCTRCT