Clinical implications from daily physiotherapy examination of 131 acute hamstring injuries and their association with running speed and rehabilitation progression
The short answer
Which daily clinical tests best track rehabilitation progress and running readiness in athletes with acute hamstring injuries?
In 131 athletes with MRI-confirmed acute hamstring injuries, outer range strength, the MHFAKE flexibility test, and palpation pain length were the most useful daily measures for tracking rehabilitation progress and perceived running effort. No single measure tracked perfectly, and all showed non-linear improvement patterns.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study131 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- Outer range hamstring strength (as a percentage of the uninjured leg) best reflected both rehabilitation progression and perceived running effort among strength tests
- MHFAKE (maximum hip flexion with active knee extension) outperformed the standard straight leg raise as a daily flexibility marker
- Palpation pain length was usefully associated with rehabilitation progression, declining from a maximum early in recovery to zero by end of rehab
- Daily pain scores typically normalised by about 30-40% of rehabilitation duration, limiting their usefulness in the second half of rehab
- At perceived running efforts below about 40% of maximum, actual running speed varied so widely between individuals that the measure was clinically meaningless
How it was conducted
- Design
- Pooled cohort from two single-site prospective randomised controlled trials
- Participants
- 131 male professional or competitive athletes with MRI-confirmed acute grade I or II hamstring injury
- Setting
- Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar; data collected January 2011 to August 2016
- Intervention
- Standardised criteria-based staged physiotherapy rehabilitation protocol with daily clinical measurement
- Primary outcomes
- Association of daily clinical measures with (1) percentage of return-to-participation duration completed and (2) perceived running effort (0-100%)
- Analysis
- Univariate correlations (adjusted R2) using second-order polynomial fits; ICC and minimal detectable change for reliability
What they found
- Intrarater reliability was excellent for all strength and flexibility measures (lower bound of 95% CI never below 0.80 for any measure)
- Inner range strength intrarater ICC 0.87 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.89), MDC 4.9 kg (22.2% of mean)
- Mid-range strength intrarater ICC 0.89 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.90), MDC 5.6 kg (19.8% of mean)
- Outer range strength intrarater ICC 0.90 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.92), MDC 6.1 kg (18.5% of mean)
- SLR intrarater ICC 0.88 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.90), MDC 13.0 degrees (14.1% of mean)
- MHFAKE intrarater ICC 0.83 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.86), MDC 17.2 degrees (20.9% of mean)
- Inter-rater reliability was lower; inner range ICC 0.69 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.83), MHFAKE ICC 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98)
- Variance in treatment progression explained (adjusted R2): daily pain 0.29, palpation pain length 0.18, SLR ROM 0.29, MHFAKE ROM 0.29, inner range strength 0.24, mid-range strength 0.27, outer range strength 0.27
- Variance in running progression explained (adjusted R2): MHFAKE ROM 0.35, outer range strength 0.34, mid-range strength 0.31, SLR ROM 0.20, daily pain 0.15, palpation pain length 0.05
- Mean return-to-participation duration was 23.9 (SD 10.8) days; 96.9% of athletes were professional level
- SLR flexibility normalised early, with very few subjects showing less than 90% of the uninjured leg within a few days of commencing rehabilitation, limiting its tracking utility
- At lower perceived running effort (below approximately 40% of maximum), variability in actual running speed was too great to be clinically meaningful; association improved at higher running intensities
Limitations
- All athletes followed the same criteria-based protocol at a single high-performance centre, limiting generalisability to community settings or athletes on different rehabilitation programmes
- Only univariate analyses were performed; multivariate combinations of measures may explain more variance
- Reliability data were collected on the uninjured leg only; no reliability data were available for palpation or subjective pain reports
- Running speed was timed with a handheld stopwatch, introducing measurement error compared with electronic timing
Why it matters
- For patients
- Athletes recovering from a hamstring strain can expect daily palpation, a specific active knee extension flexibility test, and outer range strength testing to be the most informative checks on how their rehabilitation is progressing.
- For clinicians
- A focused 5-minute daily assessment of palpation pain length, outer range strength percentage, MHFAKE percentage, and reported pain during activities provides the most useful information for progressing hamstring rehabilitation; the SLR can largely be dropped as a tracking tool.
- For readers
- This large prospective cohort provides normative trajectories and reliability benchmarks for daily hamstring assessment, supporting evidence-based selection of clinical tests over a full rehabilitation course.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097616
Read the original paperMore Running studies
- The protective effect of preseason running workload against in-season hamstring strain injuries in elite soccer playersPrimary study
- How much running is too much? Identifying high-risk running sessions in a 5200-person cohort studyCohort study
- Effects of rocker-bottom shoes on the gait biomechanics of running and walking: a systematic reviewSystematic review
- Sprint running mechanics are associated with hamstring strain injury: a 6-month prospective studyCohort study
- Asymmetric running is associated with pain during outdoor runningPrimary study
- Effects of artificially induced leg length discrepancy on treadmill-based walking and running symmetry in healthy college studentsPrimary study