The "future" pain clinician: competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care
The short answer
What competencies do clinicians need to provide psychologically informed, person-centered care for people with chronic disabling pain?
This expert topical review argues that current pain treatment fails because clinicians lack the specific competencies to deliver psychologically informed care, and proposes a new cross-professional training model for a dedicated "pain clinician" role focused on behavior change, empathetic communication, and individualized goal-setting.
SupportsRead paper
Primary studyLimited evidence
Key points
- Current treatments for disabling pain are failing partly because clinicians are not trained to competency in psychologically informed methods, not just because the methods are ineffective
- Patients with chronic pain consistently want empathetic communication, a meaningful understanding of their condition, and individualized treatment aligned with their personal goals
- Core required competencies span five domains: person-centered communication, pain knowledge, clinical assessment, clinical reasoning, and treatment skills including graded exposure and pacing
- Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are proposed as the practical tool for clinicians to continuously evaluate whether an individualized treatment is working for each patient
- The authors argue that professional silos must be transcended and a new dedicated "pain clinician" professional category created with competency-based training
How it was conducted
- Design
- Selective narrative topical review of the psychologically informed care literature for pain
- Focus
- Patient needs, required clinician competencies, and methods for evaluating individualized treatment outcomes
- Framework used
- Fear-avoidance model as the core theoretical lens linking psychological factors to chronic pain and disability
- Illustrative material
- Two fictional clinical cases (Jannick and Susan) used to demonstrate multidimensional assessment and treatment planning
- Outcome evaluation method proposed
- Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) with visual analysis, effect size calculation, and inferential statistics
What they found
- Current best-practice guidelines are based on group-average RCT outcomes and provide little information about what works for whom individually
- Screening for psychosocial yellow flags is recommended at the first visit but is infrequently employed, and when it occurs it often has little impact on treatment choice
- Implementation of risk-based stratified care, one psychologically informed method, showed no significant benefit in recent RCTs
- Emotion-focused exposure for disabling back pain and distress was shown to be significantly better than an individual CBT pain rehabilitation program in one cited trial
- The RESTORE trial of cognitive functional therapy showed sustained improvements superior to usual care in primary care settings for people with disabling low back pain
- A SCED study of cognitive functional therapy found that patterns of change were unique to the individual, and suspected mediators (fear and pain control) changed concurrently rather than before improvements in pain and disability
Limitations
- This is a selective rather than systematic review, meaning the literature synthesis may reflect the authors' theoretical perspective rather than a comprehensive evidence base
- No original empirical data were collected or analyzed; recommendations are expert opinion supported by cited studies rather than primary findings
- Competency frameworks described are proposed rather than empirically validated in terms of their effect on patient outcomes
- Implementation of a new cross-professional "pain clinician" training model faces major structural and political barriers that are acknowledged but not fully addressed
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients with chronic pain can expect more from their clinician than a structural diagnosis and passive treatments - care that listens to their goals, explains their pain clearly, and coaches behavior change is feasible and evidence-supported.
- For clinicians
- Clinicians treating disabling pain need specific training in CBT principles, graded exposure, motivational communication, and individualized outcome monitoring - generic professional training is insufficient for this population.
- For readers
- This paper provides a structured framework connecting what chronic pain patients say they need, the competencies required to meet those needs, and a practical method (SCED) for evaluating whether care is working for each individual.
Source
doi:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0017
Read the original paperMore Clinical Practice & Education studies
- The pain of poor sleep: a clinician's guide to assessing and addressing sleep dysfunction in people with musculoskeletal pain conditionsPrimary study
- The person-centered hypothesis framework: advancing clinical reasoning in musculoskeletal pain managementPrimary study
- Opportunities for chronic pain self-management: core psychological principles and neurobiologyPrimary study
- Return-to-play criteria following a hamstring injury in professional football: a scoping reviewSystematic review
- 'Considering the reality, I am very lucky': how professional players and staff perceive injuryPrimary study
- The role of movement in physical therapist clinical reasoningPrimary study