PhysioHub

The "future" pain clinician: competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care

The short answer

What competencies do clinicians need to provide psychologically informed, person-centered care for people with chronic disabling pain?

This expert topical review argues that current pain treatment fails because clinicians lack the specific competencies to deliver psychologically informed care, and proposes a new cross-professional training model for a dedicated "pain clinician" role focused on behavior change, empathetic communication, and individualized goal-setting.

SupportsRead paper
Primary studyLimited evidence

Key points

  1. Current treatments for disabling pain are failing partly because clinicians are not trained to competency in psychologically informed methods, not just because the methods are ineffective
  2. Patients with chronic pain consistently want empathetic communication, a meaningful understanding of their condition, and individualized treatment aligned with their personal goals
  3. Core required competencies span five domains: person-centered communication, pain knowledge, clinical assessment, clinical reasoning, and treatment skills including graded exposure and pacing
  4. Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are proposed as the practical tool for clinicians to continuously evaluate whether an individualized treatment is working for each patient
  5. The authors argue that professional silos must be transcended and a new dedicated "pain clinician" professional category created with competency-based training

How it was conducted

Design
Selective narrative topical review of the psychologically informed care literature for pain
Focus
Patient needs, required clinician competencies, and methods for evaluating individualized treatment outcomes
Framework used
Fear-avoidance model as the core theoretical lens linking psychological factors to chronic pain and disability
Illustrative material
Two fictional clinical cases (Jannick and Susan) used to demonstrate multidimensional assessment and treatment planning
Outcome evaluation method proposed
Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) with visual analysis, effect size calculation, and inferential statistics

What they found

  • Current best-practice guidelines are based on group-average RCT outcomes and provide little information about what works for whom individually
  • Screening for psychosocial yellow flags is recommended at the first visit but is infrequently employed, and when it occurs it often has little impact on treatment choice
  • Implementation of risk-based stratified care, one psychologically informed method, showed no significant benefit in recent RCTs
  • Emotion-focused exposure for disabling back pain and distress was shown to be significantly better than an individual CBT pain rehabilitation program in one cited trial
  • The RESTORE trial of cognitive functional therapy showed sustained improvements superior to usual care in primary care settings for people with disabling low back pain
  • A SCED study of cognitive functional therapy found that patterns of change were unique to the individual, and suspected mediators (fear and pain control) changed concurrently rather than before improvements in pain and disability

Limitations

  • This is a selective rather than systematic review, meaning the literature synthesis may reflect the authors' theoretical perspective rather than a comprehensive evidence base
  • No original empirical data were collected or analyzed; recommendations are expert opinion supported by cited studies rather than primary findings
  • Competency frameworks described are proposed rather than empirically validated in terms of their effect on patient outcomes
  • Implementation of a new cross-professional "pain clinician" training model faces major structural and political barriers that are acknowledged but not fully addressed

Why it matters

For patients
Patients with chronic pain can expect more from their clinician than a structural diagnosis and passive treatments - care that listens to their goals, explains their pain clearly, and coaches behavior change is feasible and evidence-supported.
For clinicians
Clinicians treating disabling pain need specific training in CBT principles, graded exposure, motivational communication, and individualized outcome monitoring - generic professional training is insufficient for this population.
For readers
This paper provides a structured framework connecting what chronic pain patients say they need, the competencies required to meet those needs, and a practical method (SCED) for evaluating whether care is working for each individual.

Source

doi:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0017

Read the original paper

More Clinical Practice & Education studies