'Considering the reality, I am very lucky': how professional players and staff perceive injury
The upshot
How do professional women's football players and staff perceive injury prevention, and what barriers exist across different career stages?
Professional players and staff view current injury prevention at the elite level as good, relying on individualised care and multidisciplinary teamwork. However, players described a 'bumpy road' to professionalism marked by limited resources, lack of injury prevention strategies, and inadequate medical care at amateur and semiprofessional levels.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study18 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Professional teams use multidisciplinary staff, load monitoring, and individualised approaches that players and staff regard as effective
- Amateur and semiprofessional players face higher injury risk due to limited healthcare access, poor recovery conditions, and absence of structured prevention strategies
- The transition to professional football brought dramatic improvements in recovery, nutrition, staffing, and training conditions for most players
- Injury was viewed as multifactorial, with training load, previous injuries, menstrual cycle, mental health, and pitch quality all cited as contributors
- Participants called for education and structured injury prevention to be embedded from youth and lower-division levels, not just at the elite tier
How it was conducted
- Design
- Exploratory qualitative study using semistructured interviews, grounded theory principles, and constant comparison analysis
- Participants
- 18 participants: 5 players, 2 physiotherapists, 3 team doctors, 2 head coaches, 3 strength and conditioning coaches, 2 managers, 1 head of performance
- Teams
- 3 top-tier clubs from 2 countries (Portugal and England), representing UEFA tier 1 and tier 2
- Data collection
- Online semistructured interviews conducted March to December 2020, average duration 34 minutes (range 23 to 49 minutes)
- Analysis
- Verbatim transcription, open coding by two coders, constant comparison, MAXQDA software; saturation reached after 18 interviews
What they found
- 18 participants were interviewed across 3 clubs; saturation was reached after 16 interviews with 2 confirmatory interviews adding no new themes
- Average interview duration was 34 minutes (range 23 to 49 minutes)
- Four main concepts emerged: identifying and reporting injury; the past (bumpy road to professionalism); the present (top level, top care); and the future (we are not there yet)
- No major differences were found between the perspectives of players and staff
- Players described moving from training 2 nights per week while working 3 other jobs to full-time professional conditions as a 'drastic change'
- All players acknowledged personal responsibility for injury prevention and ownership of prevention strategies at the professional level
Limitations
- Only 3 clubs from 2 countries were included, limiting transferability to other leagues, cultures, and levels of women's football
- The sample is from a very exclusive group of elite professionals and does not reflect realities at lower or youth levels
- Researcher involvement in women's football and injury prevention may have influenced analysis, despite steps taken to improve confirmability
- Players' beliefs about the menstrual cycle increasing injury risk were reported but current evidence does not support general guidance on modulating exercise across the cycle
Why it matters
- For patients
- Female football players at non-professional levels can expect fewer injury prevention resources and support structures, which may increase injury risk during the critical pathway to professional sport.
- For clinicians
- Clinicians working in women's football should advocate for structured prevention programmes and multidisciplinary staffing at youth and semiprofessional levels, not only at the elite tier.
- For readers
- This study highlights that injury prevention quality in women's football is strongly tied to professional status and funding, and that systemic investment at lower levels is needed to protect players throughout their careers.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106891
Read the original paperMore Clinical Practice & Education studies
- The pain of poor sleep: a clinician's guide to assessing and addressing sleep dysfunction in people with musculoskeletal pain conditionsPrimary study
- The person-centered hypothesis framework: advancing clinical reasoning in musculoskeletal pain managementPrimary study
- Opportunities for chronic pain self-management: core psychological principles and neurobiologyPrimary study
- Return-to-play criteria following a hamstring injury in professional football: a scoping reviewSystematic review
- The "future" pain clinician: competencies needed to provide psychologically informed carePrimary study
- The role of movement in physical therapist clinical reasoningPrimary study