The 45-second anterior knee pain provocation test: a quick test of knee pain and sporting function in 10-14-year-old adolescents with patellofemoral pain
The upshot
Can a simple 45-second single-leg squat test detect knee pain severity and track improvement over time in adolescents with patellofemoral pain?
The 45-second Anterior Knee Pain Provocation Test (AKPP-test) reliably distinguished adolescents with patellofemoral pain from pain-free controls and improvements in the test over 12 weeks were associated with improvements in self-reported pain and sports function.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study284 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- A 45-second single-leg squat at 60 degrees knee flexion provoked significantly more pain in adolescents with patellofemoral pain (median NPRS 5) than in pain-free controls (median NPRS 0)
- ROC analysis gave an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95), with an optimal cut-off of NPRS 1.25 yielding sensitivity 0.82 and specificity 0.89
- Improvements in the AKPP-test over 12 weeks correlated with improvements in KOOS Pain (r=0.48) and KOOS Sport/Rec (r=0.40)
- The test requires no equipment and takes approximately 90 seconds including instruction, making it practical for busy clinical settings
- The test is not intended as a diagnostic tool as other anterior knee pain conditions (Osgood-Schlatter, patellar tendinopathy) may also provoke pain on a loaded flexed knee
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective cohort study with nested matched comparison
- Participants
- 151 adolescents with patellofemoral pain and 133 matched pain-free controls, mean age 12.6 and 12.3 years respectively
- Test
- 45-second unilateral static squat at 60 degrees knee flexion; pain rated on 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale immediately after
- Follow-up
- PFP group reassessed at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after a 12-week activity modification and exercise intervention
- Primary outcomes
- AKPP-test pain score, KOOS Pain, KOOS Sport/Rec, and worst pain in last 24 hours
What they found
- Median AKPP-test pain in PFP group at baseline: NPRS 5 (IQR 3-7); controls: NPRS 0 (IQR 0-0)
- AUC for discriminating PFP vs controls: 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95), P<0.01
- Optimal cut-off NPRS 1.25: sensitivity 0.82 (95% CI up to 0.90), specificity 0.89 (0.83-0.93), positive likelihood ratio 7.6
- Baseline AKPP-test correlated with KOOS Sport/Rec (r=-0.33, P<0.01), KOOS Pain (r=-0.41, P<0.01), and worst pain last 24h (r=0.39, P<0.01)
- AKPP-test pain reduced by 0.8 points (95% CI up to 1.2) at 4 weeks and 2.9 points (95% CI 1.4-2.5 referenced in text as approximately 2.5) at 12 weeks
- Change in AKPP-test over 12 weeks correlated with change in KOOS Pain (r=0.48, P<0.01) and KOOS Sport/Rec (r=0.40, P<0.01)
- Repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time on AKPP-test scores (F(1.825)=20.6, P<0.01)
Limitations
- Test-retest reliability of the AKPP-test was not evaluated in this study
- No validated patient-reported outcome measures specifically designed for adolescents with patellofemoral pain were available, making construct validity assessment imperfect
- The test cannot discriminate patellofemoral pain from other anterior knee pain conditions such as Osgood-Schlatter disease or patellar tendinopathy
- Correlations between AKPP-test and KOOS subscales were below the commonly cited threshold of r=0.50 for adequate construct validity
Why it matters
- For patients
- Adolescents with anterior knee pain can use a simple 45-second squat test during clinical visits to see in real time whether their pain is improving with treatment.
- For clinicians
- The AKPP-test is a quick, no-equipment provocation test that tracks patellofemoral pain and sports function over a treatment course, with strong discriminative accuracy and good responsiveness to change.
- For readers
- This prospective cohort provides initial evidence that a brief standardised loading test can serve as a responsive clinical outcome measure for adolescent patellofemoral pain, complementing patient-reported questionnaires.
Source
doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.002
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study