Reactive strength index and knee extension strength characteristics are predictive of single-leg hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Our take
After ACL reconstruction, which strength and plyometric measures best predict single-leg hop performance?
Reactive strength index and knee extension strength characteristics together predict about 60-61% of the variance in single-leg and triple hop distance after ACL reconstruction. The single hop reflects maximal strength, while the triple hop is more dependent on rate of force production and reactive strength.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study52 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Jump height, peak knee extension torque, and RTD 200-200 ms explained 60.9% of variance in single-leg hop distance (p < 0.001)
- RSI, peak torque, RTD 200, and RTD 100 explained 61.8% of variance in triple hop distance (p < 0.001)
- RSI correlated strongly with triple hop (r = 0.689) and single hop (r = 0.613), but only predicted triple hop in regression models
- Amortization time was not significantly correlated with any strength or hop variable and did not predict hop performance
- Single hop and triple hop provide distinct information: single hop reflects maximal strength; triple hop reflects reactive and rate-based force production
How it was conducted
- Design
- Cross-sectional descriptive laboratory study with multivariable linear regression
- Participants
- 52 individuals aged 18-36 with unilateral ACLR (35 female, 17 male); mean 37.6 months post-surgery
- Plyometric assessment
- Single-leg drop vertical jump (SLDVJ) using 10-camera 3D motion capture and embedded force plate to measure RSI, amortization time, and jump height
- Strength assessment
- Isometric knee extension MVIC torque via Biodex dynamometer; peak torque, average RTD, RTD 0-100 ms, and RTD 100-200 ms
- Hop tests
- Single-leg hop for distance and triple hop for distance on the ACLR limb; distances normalized to leg length
- Primary outcome
- Proportion of variance in normalized hop distance explained by strength and plyometric predictors
What they found
- Jump height, peak torque, and RTD 200 explained 60.9% of variance in single-leg hop distance (R2 = 0.609, p < 0.001)
- RSI, peak torque, RTD 200, and RTD 100 explained 61.8% of variance in triple hop distance (R2 = 0.618, p < 0.001)
- RSI correlated strongly with jump height (r = 0.928, p < 0.010), triple hop (r = 0.689, p < 0.010), single-leg hop (r = 0.613, p < 0.010), and peak torque (r = 0.609, p < 0.010)
- Jump height correlated strongly with triple hop (r = 0.803, p < 0.010) and single hop (r = 0.711, p < 0.010)
- RTD 200 showed a moderate positive correlation with RSI (r = 0.473, p < 0.010) and jump height (r = 0.473, p < 0.010)
- Amortization time was not significantly correlated with any strength or hop variable (all p > 0.05)
- Mean single-leg hop distance was 141.1 +/- 35.4 cm; mean triple hop distance was 456.1 +/- 107.9 cm
Limitations
- No sex-based subgroup analyses were performed, despite known sex differences in landing kinematics after ACLR
- Wide range in time since surgery (mean 37.6 +/- 23.7 months) may have introduced heterogeneity in strength and hop outcomes
- RSI was measured during a separate drop jump task, not during the triple hop itself, limiting direct mechanistic inference
- Sample drawn from a single Midwestern university and associated clinic, limiting generalizability
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients recovering from ACL reconstruction should work on both maximal strength and explosive reactive strength, as different hop tests reflect different aspects of recovery readiness.
- For clinicians
- Using both the single-leg hop and triple hop provides complementary information: the single hop captures quadriceps strength, while the triple hop captures rate of force development and reactive strength, which may be important targets for late-stage rehabilitation.
- For readers
- This study shows that passing a single hop distance threshold alone does not capture the full picture of functional recovery; plyometric capacity measured by RSI adds predictive value for more demanding hop tasks.
Source
doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003102
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study