Primary surgery versus primary rehabilitation for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
In short
For a person with an ACL rupture, does having early surgery lead to better outcomes than starting with rehabilitation and only operating later if needed?
Early ACL reconstruction and primary rehabilitation (with optional delayed surgery) produce similar patient-reported knee function, return to activity, and rates of osteoarthritis and meniscal injury. Current evidence challenges the assumption that immediate surgery is always the best first step.
ChallengesRead paper
Meta-analysis3 Trials320 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- No clinically meaningful difference in self-reported knee function at short, medium, or long-term follow-up
- No significant difference in radiological knee osteoarthritis or meniscal injury rates between the two strategies
- Primary rehabilitation showed a trend toward less knee osteoarthritis development, though with very low certainty
- Early surgery showed a trend toward better meniscal status in the long term, but only at low certainty
- Evidence quality was rated low to very low overall; only three small RCTs met inclusion criteria
How it was conducted
- Design
- Living systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Databases searched
- MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus plus six trial registries
- Studies included
- 3 RCTs with 9 reports (320 participants total)
- Participants
- Mean age 29.5 years (SD 7.05); approximately 93% injured during sport
- Intervention
- Early ACL surgical reconstruction (within 6-10 weeks) plus postoperative rehabilitation
- Comparator
- Primary supervised rehabilitation with optional delayed ACL reconstruction if instability persisted
What they found
- Self-reported knee function (short-term): SMD -0.25 (95% CrI -0.84 to 0.36), raw mean difference -4.21 IKDC points (95% CrI -14.27 to 6.07), GRADE low - not clinically meaningful (MCID 16.7 points)
- Self-reported knee function (medium-term): SMD -0.10 (95% CrI -0.59 to 0.41), raw mean difference -2.65 IKDC points (95% CrI -15.94 to 10.89), GRADE low - not clinically meaningful
- Self-reported knee function (long-term): SMD -0.21 (95% CrI -1.49 to 0.81), raw mean difference -0.96 IKDC points (95% CrI -5.79 to 3.95), GRADE very low - not clinically meaningful
- Self-reported knee function (all time points combined): SMD -0.27 (95% CrI -0.84 to 0.21), raw mean difference -5.07 IKDC points (95% CrI -15.70 to 3.99), GRADE low
- Radiological knee osteoarthritis (long-term): OR 1.45 (95% CrI 0.30 to 5.17), 95% PI 0.18 to 10.0, risk difference -72 per 1000 patients (95% CrI 144 to -384), GRADE very low
- Meniscal injury (long-term, single study): OR 0.85 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.62), GRADE low - no significant difference
- Health-related quality of life (medium-term): SMD -0.40 (95% CrI -0.88 to 0.09), raw mean difference -5.91 SF-36 points (95% CrI -13.05 to 1.32), GRADE low - not clinically meaningful
- Return to activity (medium-term): SMD -0.10 (95% CrI -0.57 to 0.38), raw mean difference -0.31 Tegner points (95% CrI -1.80 to 1.19), GRADE very low
- Return to activity (long-term): SMD -0.22 (95% CrI -0.92 to 0.39), raw mean difference -0.75 Tegner points (95% CrI -2.92 to 1.23), GRADE very low
- Adverse event graft rupture: OR 2.3 (95% CrI 0.4 to 12.4), risk difference -26 per 1000 (95% CrI 12 to -186), GRADE very low
- Knee stability (medium-term, single study): MD -1.70 (95% CI -2.65 to -0.75), GRADE moderate - favours early surgery
- Patellofemoral cartilage thickness (medium-term, single study): MD 76.00 micrometers (95% CI 10.63 to 141.37), GRADE moderate
- Cost-effectiveness (medium-term, single study): MD 0.04 QALYs (p=0.18), early surgery not cost-effective, GRADE moderate
Limitations
- Only 3 RCTs with 320 total participants; small sample size limits certainty of all estimates
- Only one trial was rated low risk of bias; others had some concerns or high risk of bias
- Surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols varied across trials, limiting direct comparison
- No data available for professional or elite athletes with the highest functional demands
Why it matters
- For patients
- Most people with an ACL tear can start with a structured rehabilitation program and achieve similar long-term knee function as those who have immediate surgery, with the option to operate later if instability persists.
- For clinicians
- Guidelines should shift toward a stepped-care model: offer primary rehabilitation first for patients without serious concomitant injuries, reserving early surgery for cases with functional instability, repairable meniscal tears, or other high-grade ligamentous injuries.
- For readers
- This living review, updated annually, provides the most current RCT-level synthesis on one of sports medicine's most debated questions, but the low-to-very-low certainty evidence means firm conclusions await larger, longer trials.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-105359
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study