Physical therapy versus glucocorticoid injection for osteoarthritis of the knee
In short
For people with knee osteoarthritis, is physical therapy better than a steroid (glucocorticoid) injection for relieving pain and improving function?
Physical therapy led to significantly less pain and better physical function than a single glucocorticoid injection at 1 year. Both treatments provided meaningful improvement, but the benefits of physical therapy were larger and more sustained.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study156 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- Physical therapy patients had a mean WOMAC score of 37.0 at 1 year versus 55.8 in the injection group, a clinically meaningful difference of 18.8 points.
- Only 10.3% of physical therapy patients failed to reach the minimal clinically important difference in WOMAC, compared with 25.6% in the injection group.
- All secondary outcomes (Global Rating of Change, Timed Up and Go, Alternate Step Test) also favored physical therapy at 1 year.
- 1-year health care costs were similar in both groups ($2,131 for physical therapy vs. $2,113 for injection).
- Adverse events were rare; one patient fainted during the injection, and no other adverse events were recorded.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial (intention-to-treat analysis)
- Setting
- Two large US Military Health System hospitals (Brooke Army Medical Center, TX and Madigan Army Medical Center, WA), October 2012 to May 2017
- Participants
- 156 adults aged 38 or older with clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4), mean age 56 years, 48% women, mean BMI 31.5
- Groups
- 78 patients received intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide injection (up to 3 over 1 year); 78 underwent physical therapy (manual therapy plus exercise, up to 8 sessions over 4-6 weeks with optional additional sessions at 4 and 9 months)
- Primary outcome
- Total WOMAC score at 1 year (range 0-240, higher = worse)
- Secondary outcomes
- Global Rating of Change scale, Timed Up and Go test, Alternate Step Test, and 1-year knee-related health care costs
What they found
- Mean WOMAC score at 1 year: 37.0 (95% CI 30.8-44.5) for physical therapy vs. 55.8 (95% CI 45.0-69.1) for glucocorticoid injection; mean between-group difference 18.8 points (95% CI 5.0 to 32.6; P = 0.008), favoring physical therapy.
- Failure to achieve minimal clinically important WOMAC improvement (12%) at 1 year: 10.3% in physical therapy group vs. 25.6% in injection group.
- Median Global Rating of Change score at 1 year: +5 ("quite a bit better") for physical therapy vs. +4 ("moderately better") for injection; 11/78 (14.1%) in physical therapy did not reach +3 threshold vs. 26/78 (33.3%) in injection group (relative risk 0.42; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80).
- Mean time to complete Alternate Step Test at 1 year: 8.0 sec (physical therapy) vs. 9.0 sec (injection); between-group difference 1.0 sec (95% CI 0.3 to 1.6; P = 0.003).
- Mean time to complete Timed Up and Go test at 1 year: 7.3 sec (physical therapy) vs. 8.1 sec (injection); between-group difference 0.9 sec (95% CI 0.3 to 1.5; P = 0.005).
- Mean 1-year knee-related health care cost: $2,131 (physical therapy) vs. $2,113 (glucocorticoid injection).
- Patients in the injection group received a mean of 2.6 injections (range 1-4); physical therapy patients attended a mean of 11.8 treatment visits (range 4-22).
Limitations
- Physical therapy patients had more total contact time with health care providers, which may have contributed to greater benefit independent of the specific treatment.
- 18% of patients in the injection group also received physical therapy during the trial, and 9% of physical therapy patients also received an injection, making the groups less distinct.
- The physical therapy group had a higher proportion of patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 3 and 4) at baseline despite randomization.
- The trial was conducted in a military health system population, and most patients were referred by primary care physicians, which may limit generalizability to other settings.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients with knee osteoarthritis are more likely to have sustained pain relief and functional improvement after a course of physical therapy than after a steroid injection.
- For clinicians
- Physical therapy should be prioritized over glucocorticoid injection as a first-line treatment for knee osteoarthritis, with comparable 1-year costs but meaningfully better pain and function outcomes.
- For readers
- This well-powered RCT published in NEJM provides direct evidence that physical therapy outperforms glucocorticoid injection at 1 year across both patient-reported and functional outcomes.
Source
doi:10.1056/nejmoa1905877
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study