PhysioHub

Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee in male professional football players: a prospective three season study of 130 cases from the UEFA elite club injury study

Our take

What causes medial collateral ligament (MCL) knee injuries in professional footballers, and how should they be diagnosed and treated?

Most MCL injuries in professional male footballers happen through contact, especially being tackled or tackling, and clinical grading of the injury agrees almost perfectly with MRI when the MCL is the main injury. Routine bracing does not appear necessary for milder grade II injuries.

DescriptiveRead paper
Cohort study115 ParticipantsModerate evidence

Key points

  1. MCL injuries made up about 3% of all injuries (130 of 4364) across 51 elite clubs over three seasons.
  2. About 75% were contact injuries, most often from being tackled (29%) or tackling (12%).
  3. Clinical examination and MRI grading agreed in 92% of cases (weighted kappa 0.87), suggesting MRI may not always be needed for diagnosis.
  4. Grade I injuries were most common, with a mean lay-off of about 10 days; overall mean lay-off was 24 days.
  5. Bracing milder grade II injuries was linked to longer time out, not faster recovery.

How it was conducted

Design
Prospective cohort (Level of evidence II), part of the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study
Setting
51 professional football clubs, 2013/2014 to 2015/2016 seasons
Participants
130 MCL injuries in 115 male professional players
Definition
MCL injury was a traumatic distraction injury to the sMCL, dMCL, or POL causing time-loss, recorded as the main diagnosis
Assessments
Clinical grading I to III, plus MRI; clinical versus MRI agreement compared in 88 cases

What they found

  • 130 of 4364 injuries were MCL injuries (3%).
  • 98 of 130 injuries (75.4%) were contact-related; being tackled accounted for 29% and tackling 12%.
  • 87.7% of injuries were isolated; associated medial meniscus injury occurred in 3.1% and cartilage injury in 2.4%.
  • Clinical and MRI grading agreed in 92% of cases (80 of 88 equal), weighted kappa 0.87.
  • Mean lay-off was 24 days (SD 22); grade I was most common with a mean lay-off of 10 days.
  • Grade II injuries treated with a brace had a longer lay-off than those without (41.5 vs 31.5 days, p=0.010; reported as 42 vs 32 days, p=0.01).
  • Bracing was used in 6.7% of grade I, 53.1% of grade II, and all grade III injuries.
  • 25% of players received injections (mostly PRP) with no difference in lay-off versus no PRP.
  • 2 surgical repairs (grade III avulsion or rupture) with return to play at 85 and 119 days.
  • 8.5% of injuries were re-injuries within 2 months; the injury was in the upper third location in 54% of cases.

Limitations

  • Only injuries where the MCL was the primary diagnosis were included, so combined or more complex knee injuries are underrepresented.
  • Treatment varied by club tradition, so the longer lay-off with grade II bracing may reflect severity selection or local practice rather than a true effect of bracing.
  • As an observational cohort, it cannot prove that any treatment causes faster or slower recovery.
  • PRP and bracing were used without supporting evidence, limiting conclusions about their value.

Why it matters

For patients
If you tear your MCL playing football, most such injuries come from a tackle and milder ones heal in roughly one to two weeks without needing a brace.
For clinicians
When the MCL is the clear primary injury, careful clinical grading agrees almost perfectly with MRI and may reduce the need for routine imaging, and routine bracing is not warranted for milder grade II injuries.
For readers
This large elite-football dataset shows MCL injuries are mostly contact-driven and that simple clinical exam can reliably grade them.

Source

doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05491-6

Read the original paper
Clinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.

More Knee studies