May the force be with you: understanding how patellofemoral joint reaction force compares across different activities and physical interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The short answer
How large is the patellofemoral joint reaction force during everyday activities, exercises, and physical interventions, and does it differ between healthy people and those with patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis?
This large descriptive review pooled patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) across 71 studies and confirmed that activities with greater knee flexion, such as stair climbing and squatting, load the joint far more than walking. Peak forces during everyday activities were broadly similar between healthy people and those with patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis. The review is a reference resource for selecting exercises to offload or progressively load the joint, not a test of any treatment.
Key points
- The patellofemoral joint reaction force is the compressive force pressing the kneecap against the thigh bone, and it rises with greater quadriceps force and deeper knee flexion.
- In healthy adults, peak force averaged about 0.9 body weights when walking but 3.2 climbing stairs, 2.8 descending, and 5.2 running.
- Forces during everyday activities were not clearly higher in people with patellofemoral pain; if anything, direct comparisons showed similar or slightly lower forces in those with pain.
- Therapeutic exercises spanned a wide range, with squats producing roughly 1 to 18 body weights depending on depth, load, and modelling method.
- Included studies were mostly small with high risk of bias for external validity, and considerable variability prevented pooling for exercises and interventions.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Systematic review with partial meta-analysis of observational and interventional biomechanics studies (PROSPERO CRD42016033552)
- Search
- Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SportDiscus, Cochrane Library; 71 studies included
- Participants
- Healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis; most studies had fewer than 30 participants
- Outcomes
- Peak and average PFJRF (in body weights) during walking, stairs, running, exercises, and physical interventions
- Analysis
- Weighted average of means and SD; modified Downs and Black quality appraisal; no formal certainty (GRADE) assessment
What they found
- Healthy adults, pooled peak PFJRF: walking 0.9 plus or minus 0.4 BW (9 studies), stair ascent 3.2 plus or minus 0.7 BW (6 studies), stair descent 2.8 plus or minus 0.5 BW (4 studies), running 5.2 plus or minus 1.2 BW (17 studies).
- Patellofemoral pain, pooled peak PFJRF: walking 0.8 plus or minus 0.2 BW, stair ascent 2.5 plus or minus 0.5 BW, stair descent 2.6 plus or minus 0.8 BW, running 4.1 plus or minus 0.9 BW.
- Single studies in patellofemoral osteoarthritis or cartilage defects: walking 1.3 plus or minus 0.5 BW, stair ascent 1.6 plus or minus 0.4 BW, stair descent 1.0 plus or minus 0.5 BW.
- Walking PFJRF in healthy people averaged 0.90 BW (95% CI 0.84 to 0.96); running averaged 5.2 BW (95% CI 5.1 to 5.3).
- Therapeutic-exercise forces (unpooled) ranged from about 1 to 18 BW for squats, 3 to 6 BW for lunges, 1 to 7 BW for cycling, and 9 to 11 BW for jumping.
- Direct cross-sectional comparisons mostly showed lower or no-different peak force in people with patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis versus healthy controls, based on only one or two studies per activity.
Limitations
- This review describes joint loading and does not test the effectiveness of any treatment or link force to clinical outcomes.
- Most everyday-activity comparisons between healthy and patellofemoral groups rest on weighted-average means, not direct statistical comparisons, and direct comparisons came from only one or two studies.
- Considerable methodological variability (87% used 2D planar models, mostly from cadaveric source data) precluded pooling for exercises and interventions and limits accuracy in living people with pathology.
- Sample sizes were small (most under 30), only English-language studies were included, and no certainty (GRADE) assessment was performed.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Deeper knee-bending activities like squats and stairs put much more force on your kneecap joint than walking, and carrying excess body weight raises that load.
- For clinicians
- Use these force values to pick and grade exercises, choosing variations that load the patellofemoral joint less at a given knee flexion angle when offloading is the goal.
- For readers
- People with patellofemoral pain do not appear to have higher kneecap joint forces during everyday activities, so symptoms may relate more to contact area and load location than to raw force.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-104686
Read the original paperMore Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study