Importance of functional performance and psychological readiness for return to pre-injury level of sports 1 year after ACL reconstruction in competitive athletes
The upshot
After ACL reconstruction, what tested at 6 months predicts whether a competitive athlete actually returns to their pre-injury sport a year later?
In competitive athletes, single-leg hop performance and psychological readiness measured 6 months after ACL reconstruction predicted return to pre-injury sport at 1 year better than strength tests alone. Scoring below the cut-offs (hop under about 81% of the other leg, readiness under 55 points) was linked to not making it back.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study124 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- Two factors at 6 months independently predicted 1-year return to sport: single-leg hop symmetry and the ACL-RSI psychological readiness score.
- Quadriceps strength, hamstring strength, and the IKDC score did not stay significant once hop and readiness were accounted for.
- A single-leg hop below 81.3% of the uninjured leg flagged most athletes who would not return (sensitivity 0.891).
- A psychological readiness score below 55 was a more specific warning sign (specificity 0.826).
- These two quick tests can screen athletes at 6 months so rehab can target whoever falls short.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective prognostic cohort study
- Participants
- 124 competitive athletes (Tegner activity score over 7) after primary ACL reconstruction
- Tests at 6 months
- Quadriceps index, hamstrings index, single-leg hop, IKDC score, and ACL-RSI psychological readiness
- Outcome
- Self-reported return to pre-injury sport level at 1 year (return vs no return)
- Analysis
- Multivariate logistic regression plus ROC analysis to find optimal 6-month cut-offs
What they found
- At 1 year, 101 athletes returned to sport and 23 did not.
- Single-leg hop was an independent predictor (odds ratio 2.861 per 10-unit increase, P<0.001).
- ACL-RSI psychological readiness was an independent predictor (odds ratio 1.810 per 10-unit increase, P=0.001).
- Optimal single-leg hop cut-off was 81.3% (sensitivity 0.891, specificity 0.609).
- Optimal ACL-RSI cut-off was 55 points (sensitivity 0.693, specificity 0.826).
- Strength indices (quadriceps, hamstrings) and IKDC did not remain significant in the multivariate model.
Limitations
- Return to sport was self-reported at 1 year, which can be inaccurate.
- Only 23 athletes did not return, a small group for building a prediction model.
- Findings come from one cohort of competitive athletes, so the cut-offs may not transfer to recreational athletes or other settings.
- As an observational study it shows association, not proof that improving these scores causes more athletes to return.
Why it matters
- For patients
- If your 6-month hop test or confidence score is low, it is a signal to keep rehabbing rather than rush back, not a verdict that you will fail.
- For clinicians
- Add a single-leg hop test and the ACL-RSI to 6-month follow-up so athletes below roughly 81% hop or 55 readiness can be flagged for targeted work.
- For readers
- Confidence and functional hop ability matter as much as raw strength when judging readiness to return after ACL surgery.
Source
doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05774-y
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study