How do we explain painful non-traumatic knee conditions to adolescents? A multiple-methods study
The takeaway
How should clinicians explain chronic non-traumatic knee pain to adolescents so that they understand their condition and feel less uncertain?
A multiple-method study developed six plain-language explanations for the most common adolescent knee pain diagnoses by combining a systematic literature review, expert Delphi consensus, and user testing with adolescents. Three key domains were identified: what the diagnosis means, what causes the pain, and how to manage it.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study23 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Adolescents with chronic knee pain often feel stigmatized, confused by diagnostic labels, and worried that something serious has been missed
- Perceived diagnostic uncertainty can increase anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and fear, and may reduce acceptance of self-management advice
- Expert consensus highlighted four themes for credible explanations: multidimensional perspective, tailoring to adolescents, validation and reassurance, and careful wording
- Think-aloud testing with adolescents (n=7) found that medical jargon and long sentences were the main barriers to understanding, and most problems were resolved after the first testing session
- The six resulting explanations are a framework for clinicians, not a one-size-fits-all checklist, and their clinical effectiveness has not yet been tested
How it was conducted
- Design
- Multiple-method study combining systematic literature searches, Argumentative Delphi with international experts, and think-aloud user testing with adolescents
- Systematic search
- Two MEDLINE searches (March 2022): one on adolescents' information needs for chronic musculoskeletal pain (16 qualitative papers included from 3,239 screened), one on etiology of non-traumatic knee pain (64 papers included from 2,934 screened)
- Delphi participants
- 16 international experts (physiotherapists n=9, medical doctors n=5, psychologist n=1, academic researcher n=1) from 7 countries; 2 rounds conducted April-June 2022
- User testing
- Think-aloud exercises with 7 adolescents aged 8-15 years (2 with current knee pain) in two iterative sessions
- Conditions covered
- Growth pain, Iliotibial Band Syndrome, Osgood-Schlatter, Patellar Tendinopathy, Patellofemoral Pain, and Sinding-Larssen-Johansson
What they found
- Systematic search one yielded 3,239 papers; 16 were included and produced 5 themes: understanding causes and contributors to pain, feeling stigmatized for an invisible condition, having a name for pain, controllability of pain, and worry about something being missed
- Systematic search two yielded 2,934 papers; 64 were included describing etiology and pathogenesis of non-traumatic knee pain
- Delphi Round One: 18 of 32 enrolled experts responded; Round Two: 16 responded (89% response rate)
- Expert ratings improved between rounds: 7 of 18 experts rated the explanations as 'agree' or 'strongly agree' in Round One, rising to 13 of 16 in Round Two
- Think-aloud sessions: interview duration ranged 18-45 minutes (mean 29 min); most comprehension problems were identified and resolved in Session One; Session Two showed greatly reduced comprehension problems and required little to no extra mental effort
- Three key domains were identified: 'What is (diagnosis) and what does it mean?', 'What is causing my knee pain?', and 'How do I manage my knee pain?'
Limitations
- Only one database (MEDLINE) was used for systematic searches, so relevant papers may have been missed
- The majority of Delphi experts were physiotherapists (n=9 of 16), which may bias findings toward that profession's views
- Only one of the six credible explanations was tested in think-aloud exercises with adolescents
- Only two of seven think-aloud participants had current knee pain, potentially missing important perspectives from those most affected
Why it matters
- For patients
- Adolescents with knee pain often leave consultations confused and worried; these explanations are designed to give a clear, reassuring, and age-appropriate account of what their diagnosis means and what they can do about it.
- For clinicians
- Clinicians can use the three-domain framework (what it is, why it hurts, how to manage it) as a guide for structuring patient education conversations, with language tailored to the individual adolescent's developmental level.
- For readers
- This study shows that developing effective patient education materials requires input from patients, experts, and end-users together, and that even well-designed materials need iterative testing with the target age group before clinical use.
Source
doi:10.1002/ejp.2210
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study