Contractile rate of force development after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis
The verdict
After ACL reconstruction, how much does the ability to generate force quickly (rate of force development) stay reduced in the operated leg, compared with the other leg and with healthy people?
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 observational studies (n = 246) found that the ability to produce force rapidly (rate of force development, RFD) stays suppressed in the reconstructed leg long after ACL reconstruction. The reconstructed limb showed moderate to large RFD deficits in the knee extensors and flexors compared with the person's other leg, and even larger deficits compared with healthy controls. Because RFD weakness can persist for years and may not show up on peak strength testing alone, the authors argue RFD should be monitored throughout rehabilitation and return to sport.
Key points
- Rate of force development (RFD) is how fast a muscle builds force at the start of a contraction, which matters for fast actions like landing, cutting, and catching a stumble, separate from raw maximal strength.
- Comparing the reconstructed leg to the uninjured leg, knee extensor RFD deficits were large early-phase (SMD -1.07) and late-phase (SMD -0.85), with knee flexor deficits moderate (SMD -0.74 and -0.79).
- Compared with healthy controls the deficits were larger still, with knee extensor SMD -1.42 (early) and -1.09 (late).
- Between-limb RFD asymmetry was highest in the first months (up to 57% for the knee extensors) and could still be present 2 to 4 years after surgery.
- RFD is trainable, so the authors recommend explosive and high-intent resistance training to rebuild rapid force before return to sport.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 non-randomized observational studies (no RCTs available), following PRISMA
- Search
- Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PubMed-MEDLINE, ScienceDirect to August 2019; quality rated with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (all moderate to high)
- Participants
- 246 individuals post-ACLR (109 female, 137 male), mean age 18 to 29.6 years, 4 to 49 months post-surgery; 4 studies also had healthy controls
- Outcomes
- Isometric knee extensor and flexor RFD, early-phase (<100 ms) and late-phase (>=100 ms), as between-limb asymmetry and vs healthy controls
- Analysis
- Random-effects meta-analysis pooling standardized mean differences (SMD), inverse-variance weighted; heterogeneity by I2 and tau-square
What they found
- Reconstructed vs uninjured limb, knee extensor RFD: early-phase SMD -1.07 (95% CI -1.46 to -0.68; I2 = 22%), late-phase SMD -0.85 (95% CI -1.27 to -0.42; I2 = 79%).
- Reconstructed vs uninjured limb, knee flexor RFD: early-phase SMD -0.74 (95% CI -1.19 to -0.29), late-phase SMD -0.79 (95% CI -1.19 to -0.39).
- ACLR vs healthy controls, knee extensor RFD: early-phase SMD -1.42 (95% CI -2.10 to -0.73), late-phase SMD -1.09 (95% CI -1.81 to -0.38).
- ACLR vs healthy controls, knee flexor RFD: early-phase SMD -0.78 (95% CI -1.96 to -0.39), late-phase SMD -1.14 (95% CI -1.60 to -0.67).
- Between-limb knee extensor RFD asymmetry ranged 7% to 57% and knee flexor 5% to 32% across time intervals; asymmetry could persist 2 to 4 years after surgery.
Limitations
- All included studies were observational with no randomized trials, and quality varied with predominantly volunteer samples.
- Only 246 participants total, mostly young males, limiting generalizability, and the small study count prevented subgroup analysis or meta-regression.
- Rehabilitation protocols and graft types varied and were poorly described, and there were no pre-injury RFD data, so confounders may have distorted the ACLR-RFD relationship.
- Moderate to high statistical heterogeneity was present for several pooled comparisons.
Why it matters
- For patients
- After an ACL reconstruction your operated leg may stay slower at producing force for a long time, even when ordinary strength looks recovered, so rebuilding explosive power matters.
- For clinicians
- Consider adding RFD testing alongside peak-strength and limb-symmetry assessments during ACLR rehab, and program explosive or ballistic resistance training before return to sport.
- For readers
- Rate of force development reveals rapid-force deficits after ACL reconstruction that maximal strength testing alone can miss.
Source
doi:10.1111/sms.13733
Read the original paperMore Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study