Compensatory strategies that reduce knee extensor demand during a bilateral squat change from 3 to 5 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
In short
After ACL reconstruction, how do people compensate to reduce load on the surgical knee during a bilateral squat, and does this change between 3 and 5 months post-surgery?
Following ACL reconstruction, substantial knee extensor moment deficits in the surgical limb persist unchanged from 3 to 5 months, but the compensatory strategy shifts: at 3 months patients unload via both limbs (shifting weight to the non-surgical side and hip), while by 5 months they rely solely on shifting demand from the knee to the hip within the surgical limb.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study11 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Knee extensor moment deficits in the surgical limb averaged 38% at 3 months and approximately 30% at 5 months, but this improvement was not statistically significant
- At 3 months, both inter-limb (weight shift to non-surgical leg) and intra-limb (hip-dominant loading) compensations together explained 85% of the variance in knee extensor moment deficits
- At 5 months, only the intra-limb hip-dominant strategy predicted knee extensor moment deficits, accounting for 58% of variance
- The vertical ground reaction force was on average 13% lower under the surgical limb, and the hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio was 40% larger in the surgical limb compared to the non-surgical limb
- Differences in knee angle between limbs were small (about 2.4 degrees), making clinical detection challenging
How it was conducted
- Design
- Controlled laboratory study, longitudinal observational
- Participants
- 11 individuals post-ACLr (7 females, 4 males; mean age 22.9 years; mean weight 67.5 kg)
- Time points
- 3 months (T3) and 5 months (T5) post-surgery
- Task
- Bilateral bodyweight squat to self-selected depth, each foot on a separate force platform
- Instrumentation
- 11-camera 3D motion capture at 250 Hz plus dual force platforms at 1500 Hz
- Primary analysis
- 2-way repeated measures MANOVA (limb x time) and stepwise linear regression of inter- and intra-limb compensations on knee extensor moment ratio
What they found
- Surgical limb showed significantly less peak knee extensor moment compared to non-surgical limb (0.367 plus or minus 0.18 Nm/kg; P < 0.001; effect size 2.16)
- Surgical limb showed significantly less peak knee flexion angle (2.4 plus or minus 2.6 degrees; P = 0.013; effect size 0.95)
- Surgical limb showed significantly less peak vertical ground reaction force (0.090 plus or minus 0.06 N/kg; P < 0.001; effect size 1.69)
- Surgical limb hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio was significantly greater than non-surgical limb (0.677 plus or minus 0.55; P = 0.002; effect size 1.28)
- At 3 months, vGRF ratio and hip/knee ratio together predicted knee extensor moment ratio (R2 = 0.854, P < 0.001); vGRF ratio alone explained R2 = 0.624 (P = 0.004, Beta = 0.790), hip/knee ratio added R2 = 0.230 (P = 0.007, Beta = -0.492)
- At 5 months, only hip/knee ratio predicted knee extensor moment ratio (R2 = 0.584, P = 0.006, Beta = -0.765)
- No significant limb-by-time interaction was observed (main effect of limb: F = 6.59, P = 0.028), indicating deficits did not significantly change between 3 and 5 months
Limitations
- Very small sample size (n = 11) limits generalizability to broader clinical populations
- No strength or EMG data were collected, so the role of quadriceps weakness or hamstring co-contraction in driving compensations cannot be determined
- Surgical techniques, graft types, surgeons, and treating therapists varied across participants, preventing attribution of findings to any specific intervention
- Two participants had previous contralateral ACLr, which may have affected ratio calculations by making those individuals appear less impaired
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients after ACL reconstruction should be aware that even during simple bodyweight squats they may be significantly under-loading the surgical knee for at least 5 months, and targeted rehabilitation cues may be needed to correct this.
- For clinicians
- Clinicians should actively monitor and correct both weight distribution between limbs and hip-dominant compensations during bilateral squats throughout early-to-mid rehabilitation, as visual assessment of knee angle alone is insufficient to detect these deficits.
- For readers
- This study provides longitudinal biomechanical evidence that compensatory loading strategies after ACLr are not static and evolve over time, highlighting specific mechanical targets for rehabilitation programming.
Source
doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7977
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study