A randomized clinical trial comparing patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and double-bundle ACL reconstructions: patient-reported and clinical outcomes at 5-year follow-up
In short
Does the type of graft used for ACL reconstruction (patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, or double-bundle hamstring) affect quality of life and knee function at 2 years?
All three graft types produced similar disease-specific quality-of-life and functional outcomes at 2 years, so no single technique is clearly superior. The patellar tendon graft did produce significantly less side-to-side knee laxity than the other two options, but this did not translate into better patient-reported outcomes.
SupportsRead paper
RCT330 ParticipantsStrong evidence
Key points
- Quality-of-life scores at 2 years were statistically identical across all three graft types (PT=84.6, HT=82.5, DB=82.4 out of 100)
- Patellar tendon reconstruction produced significantly less knee laxity (KT-1000 side-to-side difference 1.86 mm vs 2.97 mm for HT and 2.65 mm for DB)
- IKDC Objective grades, pivot shift, single-leg hop, Tegner activity, and Cincinnati Occupational scores were not statistically different between groups
- Double-bundle reconstruction requires longer operative time (median 85 min vs 68 min for HT and 74 min for PT) with no additional patient benefit
- Blinding was successfully achieved: patients guessed graft type correctly only 51% of the time and the independent examiner 46% of the time
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial with intraoperative computer-generated allocation, stratified by injury chronicity
- Participants
- 330 patients aged 14-50 years with isolated ACL deficiency, enrolled at the University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, 2004-2010
- Groups
- 110 per group: (1) patellar tendon (PT), (2) quadruple-stranded hamstring tendon (HT), (3) double-bundle using hamstring tendons (DB)
- Primary outcome
- ACL Quality-of-Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire score (0-100) at minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up
- Secondary outcomes
- IKDC subjective and objective scores, KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, pivot shift, range of motion, Tegner activity, Cincinnati Occupational Scale, single-leg hop
- Follow-up
- Assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 months, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively
What they found
- ACL-QOL scores at 2 years were not significantly different between groups (P=0.591): PT mean 84.6 (SD 16.6, 95% CI 81.4-87.8), HT mean 82.5 (SD 17.7, 95% CI 79.2-85.9), DB mean 82.4 (SD 17.5, 95% CI 79.1-85.7)
- All groups improved significantly in ACL-QOL over time (P=0.001)
- KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences at 2 years were significantly different between PT and HT (P=0.002) and PT and DB (P=0.044): PT mean 1.86 mm (SD 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-2.3), HT mean 2.97 mm (SD 2.1, 95% CI 2.6-3.4 reported as 3.0), DB mean 2.65 mm (SD 2.4, 95% CI 2.2-3.1 reported as 2.7); overall ANOVA P=0.002
- IKDC Objective grades at 2 years showed no statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.658 with LOCF, P=0.630 without imputed data)
- IKDC Subjective scores at 2 years were not significantly different: PT mean 84.6 (SD 13.8), HT mean 85.3 (SD 11.6), DB mean 84.2 (SD 11.8)
- Pivot shift grades at 2 years were not significantly different between groups
- Single-leg hop test at 2 years showed no significant difference (P=0.761): PT 95.4% of opposite knee (SD 9.8), HT 96.3% (SD 26.5), DB 94.4% (SD 13.4)
- Tegner activity level of 6 or greater at 2 years was not significantly different (P=0.814): PT 84%, HT 80%, DB 83%
- Mean operative times: PT 75.3 min (SD 14.7), HT 67.8 min (SD 14.6), DB 88.0 min (SD 14.9)
- Correct graft-type guesses: 51% by patients overall, 46% by the independent examiner, confirming successful blinding
Limitations
- Single-surgeon, single-centre study limits generalizability; results may not apply to surgeons earlier in their learning curve with double-bundle technique
- Follow-up was a minimum of 2 years; longer-term outcomes including rates of osteoarthritis and graft re-rupture are not reported here
- Patients and the independent examiner were unblinded at the 2-year visit, so outcomes beyond 2 years may be subject to unblinding bias
- The study was not powered specifically to detect small differences in secondary outcomes, and some subgroup comparisons may be underpowered
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction can expect similar recovery and quality of life regardless of whether their surgeon uses a patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, or double-bundle technique at 2 years.
- For clinicians
- There is no quality-of-life benefit to choosing double-bundle over single-bundle ACL reconstruction at 2 years, and patellar tendon grafts produce less residual knee laxity on objective testing, though this did not translate to better patient outcomes.
- For readers
- This well-conducted double-blind RCT fills a key evidence gap by directly comparing all three main autograft strategies, using a disease-specific patient-reported outcome as the primary measure with adequate blinding.
Source
doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000000165
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study