A 10% increase in step rate improves running kinematics and clinical outcomes in runners with patellofemoral pain at 4 weeks and 3 months
The short answer
Can increasing running step rate by 10% reduce pain and improve running mechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain?
A single gait retraining session that increased step rate by 10% produced significant reductions in pain and improvements in running mechanics and function in runners with patellofemoral pain, and these gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. The study was small and uncontrolled, so findings should be confirmed in larger randomised trials.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study12 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- A single 10-minute session with an audible metronome was used to increase step rate by 10%; runners then self-monitored with a GPS smartwatch
- Pain scores dropped from an average of 6.2/10 at baseline to 1.0/10 at 4 weeks and 0.3/10 at 3 months
- Frontal-plane hip and pelvic kinematics improved significantly and the gains held at 3-month follow-up
- Only runners confirmed to have aberrant hip and pelvis kinematics at baseline were enrolled, which may explain the larger improvements compared with previous studies
- The approach can be self-administered outside a clinical lab, requiring minimal supervision
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective case series (Level of evidence 4); registered clinical trial NCT03067545
- Participants
- 12 runners with confirmed patellofemoral pain AND aberrant frontal-plane hip and/or pelvis kinematics on 3D gait analysis (4 male, 8 female; mean age 39.9 years)
- Intervention
- Single 10-minute session increasing step rate by 10% using an audible metronome; self-monitored thereafter with GPS smartwatch and metronome app
- Follow-up
- Baseline, 4 weeks post-retraining, and 3 months post-retraining
- Primary outcomes
- Peak contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, knee flexion during stance; pain (NRS 0-10); Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); weekly running volume; longest pain-free run
What they found
- Step rate increased by an average of 11.2% at 4 weeks (MD 18.6 steps/min, 95% CI 11.97-25.23) and 9.2% at 3 months (MD 15.1 steps/min, 95% CI 10.64-19.57)
- Contralateral pelvic drop reduced by 3.12 degrees at 4 weeks (95% CI 1.88-4.37 deg) and 2.7 degrees at 3 months (95% CI 1.4-4.1 deg); p<.01
- Hip adduction reduced by 3.99 degrees at 4 weeks (95% CI 2.01-5.96 deg) and 2.8 degrees at 3 months (95% CI 0.4-5.4 deg); p<.01
- Peak knee flexion during stance reduced by 4.10 degrees at 4 weeks (95% CI 0.04-8.15 deg) and 4.15 degrees at 3 months (95% CI 0.81-7.48 deg); p<.01
- Worst pain (NRS) dropped from mean 6.2 at baseline to 1.0 at 4 weeks and 0.3 at 3 months (chi-square 21.38, p<.01), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 1.2 points
- LEFS improved from 62.3 at baseline to 76.6 at 4 weeks and 79.7 at 3 months (chi-square 22.29, p=.01), a 17.4-point improvement at 3 months exceeding the MCID of 9 points
- Total weekly running volume increased by MD 13.78 km (95% CI 4.62-22.93 km); longest pain-free run increased by MD 6.84 km (95% CI 3.05-10.62 km)
- Hip internal rotation showed no significant change at any time point (p=.93)
Limitations
- No control group, making it impossible to fully separate intervention effects from natural history or regression to the mean
- Very small sample (n=12), limiting statistical power to detect differences between follow-up time points
- Participants were highly selected - only those with confirmed aberrant kinematics were included, so results may not generalise to all runners with patellofemoral pain
- Training volume was not controlled after 4 weeks; one participant sustained a tibial stress fracture possibly related to a sudden training increase rather than the intervention itself
Why it matters
- For patients
- Runners with kneecap pain who have abnormal hip movement patterns may achieve meaningful pain relief and return to longer runs through a simple step-rate change they can manage themselves with a free metronome app and smartwatch.
- For clinicians
- Gait analysis to screen for aberrant frontal-plane kinematics before prescribing step-rate retraining appears important - enrolling only biomechanical responders may explain the larger clinical gains seen here compared with unselected cohorts.
- For readers
- This small uncontrolled case series provides promising early evidence that a one-session, self-administered cadence intervention can improve both mechanics and outcomes in a selected subset of runners with patellofemoral pain, but randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy.
Source
doi:10.1177/0363546519879693
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.
More Knee studies
- Low-load blood flow restriction vs heavy-load resistance training in early rehab after BPTB ACL reconstruction: RCTRCT
- Sticks and stones: bias and readability assessment in LLM-generated patient education for anterior cruciate injuryPrimary study
- Effect of knee extensor power on knee pain in adults with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the MOST studyPrimary study
- Considerations for a women's rehabilitation programme following ACL reconstruction: a concept mapping approachPrimary study
- Rethinking acute sports injuries: evidence for an overuse mechanism in hamstring and ACL injuriesPrimary study
- A new way of grading severity of ACL rupture on acute MRI to consider potential for non-surgical healing with the Cross Bracing Protocol (ACL-ARCH criteria)Primary study