PhysioHub

A 10% increase in step rate improves running kinematics and clinical outcomes in runners with patellofemoral pain at 4 weeks and 3 months

The short answer

Can increasing running step rate by 10% reduce pain and improve running mechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain?

A single gait retraining session that increased step rate by 10% produced significant reductions in pain and improvements in running mechanics and function in runners with patellofemoral pain, and these gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. The study was small and uncontrolled, so findings should be confirmed in larger randomised trials.

SupportsRead paper
Primary study12 ParticipantsLimited evidence

Key points

  1. A single 10-minute session with an audible metronome was used to increase step rate by 10%; runners then self-monitored with a GPS smartwatch
  2. Pain scores dropped from an average of 6.2/10 at baseline to 1.0/10 at 4 weeks and 0.3/10 at 3 months
  3. Frontal-plane hip and pelvic kinematics improved significantly and the gains held at 3-month follow-up
  4. Only runners confirmed to have aberrant hip and pelvis kinematics at baseline were enrolled, which may explain the larger improvements compared with previous studies
  5. The approach can be self-administered outside a clinical lab, requiring minimal supervision

How it was conducted

Design
Prospective case series (Level of evidence 4); registered clinical trial NCT03067545
Participants
12 runners with confirmed patellofemoral pain AND aberrant frontal-plane hip and/or pelvis kinematics on 3D gait analysis (4 male, 8 female; mean age 39.9 years)
Intervention
Single 10-minute session increasing step rate by 10% using an audible metronome; self-monitored thereafter with GPS smartwatch and metronome app
Follow-up
Baseline, 4 weeks post-retraining, and 3 months post-retraining
Primary outcomes
Peak contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, knee flexion during stance; pain (NRS 0-10); Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); weekly running volume; longest pain-free run

What they found

  • Step rate increased by an average of 11.2% at 4 weeks (MD 18.6 steps/min, 95% CI 11.97-25.23) and 9.2% at 3 months (MD 15.1 steps/min, 95% CI 10.64-19.57)
  • Contralateral pelvic drop reduced by 3.12 degrees at 4 weeks (95% CI 1.88-4.37 deg) and 2.7 degrees at 3 months (95% CI 1.4-4.1 deg); p<.01
  • Hip adduction reduced by 3.99 degrees at 4 weeks (95% CI 2.01-5.96 deg) and 2.8 degrees at 3 months (95% CI 0.4-5.4 deg); p<.01
  • Peak knee flexion during stance reduced by 4.10 degrees at 4 weeks (95% CI 0.04-8.15 deg) and 4.15 degrees at 3 months (95% CI 0.81-7.48 deg); p<.01
  • Worst pain (NRS) dropped from mean 6.2 at baseline to 1.0 at 4 weeks and 0.3 at 3 months (chi-square 21.38, p<.01), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 1.2 points
  • LEFS improved from 62.3 at baseline to 76.6 at 4 weeks and 79.7 at 3 months (chi-square 22.29, p=.01), a 17.4-point improvement at 3 months exceeding the MCID of 9 points
  • Total weekly running volume increased by MD 13.78 km (95% CI 4.62-22.93 km); longest pain-free run increased by MD 6.84 km (95% CI 3.05-10.62 km)
  • Hip internal rotation showed no significant change at any time point (p=.93)

Limitations

  • No control group, making it impossible to fully separate intervention effects from natural history or regression to the mean
  • Very small sample (n=12), limiting statistical power to detect differences between follow-up time points
  • Participants were highly selected - only those with confirmed aberrant kinematics were included, so results may not generalise to all runners with patellofemoral pain
  • Training volume was not controlled after 4 weeks; one participant sustained a tibial stress fracture possibly related to a sudden training increase rather than the intervention itself

Why it matters

For patients
Runners with kneecap pain who have abnormal hip movement patterns may achieve meaningful pain relief and return to longer runs through a simple step-rate change they can manage themselves with a free metronome app and smartwatch.
For clinicians
Gait analysis to screen for aberrant frontal-plane kinematics before prescribing step-rate retraining appears important - enrolling only biomechanical responders may explain the larger clinical gains seen here compared with unselected cohorts.
For readers
This small uncontrolled case series provides promising early evidence that a one-session, self-administered cadence intervention can improve both mechanics and outcomes in a selected subset of runners with patellofemoral pain, but randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy.

Source

doi:10.1177/0363546519879693

Read the original paper
Clinically assessing this area? See the knee special tests.

More Knee studies