Proximal hamstring tendinopathy; expert physiotherapists' perspectives on diagnosis, management and prevention
The verdict
How do expert physiotherapists diagnose, manage, and prevent proximal hamstring tendinopathy?
Expert physiotherapists diagnose proximal hamstring tendinopathy through patient history combined with a battery of load-based pain provocation tests, not a single test. Management centres on patient education and progressive hamstring and kinetic chain loading, avoiding end-range hip flexion early in rehabilitation, with passive therapies and injections seen as having little benefit.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study13 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- All experts used a combination of patient interview findings and clinical load-based tests to diagnose PHT, not a single test
- Progressive hamstring loading starting in near-neutral hip positions was the cornerstone of rehabilitation for all respondents
- Passive interventions such as injections and surgery were not recommended by any expert physiotherapist
- Sitting pain was noted to often take over a year to resolve and frequently lagged behind functional recovery
- Prevention of recurrence relied on long-term continuation of hamstring and kinetic chain strengthening alongside workload management
How it was conducted
- Design
- Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with expert physiotherapists
- Participants
- 13 expert physiotherapists (14 contacted, 1 declined due to illness); all male; average clinical experience not fully stated but minimum 5 years required
- Geographic spread
- Australia (majority), Ireland, New Zealand, Qatar, and Scotland
- Inclusion criteria
- Registered physiotherapists with PHT experience, Masters or PhD qualification, minimum 5 years experience
- Analysis
- Qualitative content analysis with two independent researchers using NVivo; interviews continued until data saturation
- Primary outcome
- Expert perceptions on assessment, management, and prevention of PHT, organised into categories and sub-categories
What they found
- All 13 experts used a combination of patient interview and clinical examination to diagnose PHT
- All experts reported insidious onset associated with increased mechanical load through the proximal hamstring tendon
- Four experts (percentage not fully stated in text) reported symptoms primarily at the hamstring insertion, sometimes spreading down the hamstring but not past the knee
- Evidence-based pain provocation tests (Puranen-Orava, bent-knee stretch, modified bent-knee stretch) have moderate to high sensitivity (range not fully stated) and specificity (range not fully stated) for detecting MRI-defined tendinopathy, but were only used by a small percentage of the physiotherapists interviewed
- MRI structural changes in the proximal tendon are present in approximately 55% and 78% (mean age not reported) of asymptomatic people imaged
- All experts prescribed progressive load-based hamstring exercise from early to late-stage management
- No expert referred patients for platelet-rich plasma or corticosteroid injections
- Most experts noted rehabilitation typically required 3 to 6 months; sitting pain often took over a year to resolve
- Cortisocteroid injection has been shown in retrospective studies to result in greater than 50% of patients not achieving long-term symptom resolution
Limitations
- Only expert physiotherapists were interviewed, which may bias results toward non-invasive interventions and underrepresent perspectives on injection or surgical management
- The majority of experts (54%) were from Australia, which may limit external validity to other healthcare contexts
- This is qualitative expert opinion, not a controlled trial, so findings reflect clinical consensus rather than empirical evidence of treatment effectiveness
- Sample size of 13 experts limits the range of perspectives and generalisability
Why it matters
- For patients
- People with persistent deep buttock or ischial pain should expect a thorough clinical assessment using multiple movement tests rather than imaging alone, and should prepare for a graduated rehabilitation program lasting several months.
- For clinicians
- Expert consensus supports a clinical reasoning approach combining history and progressive load-based provocation tests for diagnosis, followed by education and graded hamstring and kinetic chain loading avoiding early hip flexion, with no role for routine injection referral.
- For readers
- This study fills a gap in the absence of high-quality RCT evidence for PHT by capturing expert consensus, providing a basis for developing and testing structured management protocols.
Source
doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.12.008
Read the original paperMore Tendinopathy studies
- Increased blood flow and tendon swelling precedes vascular expansion and tissue matrix changes in early human tendinopathyPrimary study
- Physiotherapy compared with shockwave therapy for proximal hamstring tendinopathy: an RCTRCT
- Tendinopathy: the interplay between mechanical stress, inflammation, and vascularityPrimary study
- Evaluation of clinical tests to diagnose iliopsoas tendinopathyPrimary study
- A personalized muscle-tendon assessment and exercise prescription concept reduces muscle-tendon injuriesPrimary study
- Do physical or imaging changes explain the effectiveness of progressive tendon loading exercisesPrimary study