The impact of a sacroiliac joint belt on function and pain using the active straight leg raise in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain
Our take
Does wearing a sacroiliac joint belt help with function and pain from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain?
In pregnant women with posterior pelvic girdle pain, a sacroiliac joint belt immediately improved leg-raise function and was linked to less pain and disability over 4 weeks, though the test of function did not predict who got the most pain relief.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study63 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- A SIJ belt immediately improved the active straight leg raise score compared with no belt.
- Pain and disability scores improved over 4 weeks of daily belt use.
- 82% of women reported they were improved on the global impression of improvement scale.
- Belts were considered safe and effective in this group, but this was an observational study with no control group.
- The immediate belt effect on leg-raise function did not predict 4-week pain outcomes.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective observational cohort at an academic center
- Participants
- 63 pregnant women aged 18 and over in the 2nd or 3rd trimester with posterior pelvic girdle pain and active straight leg raise score 2 to 10
- Intervention
- 4 weeks of daily Serola sacroiliac joint belt wear with a wear diary
- Main outcomes
- Active straight leg raise (ASLR), numeric rating scale (NRS) pain, Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII)
What they found
- Immediate belted ASLR was -2.70 points lower than unbelted on multivariable analysis (p<0.001).
- At 4 weeks ASLR improved both with the belt (mean difference -0.99, p=0.001) and without the belt (mean difference -1.94, p<0.001), with the non-belted decline being greater (mean difference -0.96, p=0.02).
- Current NRS pain decreased by -0.94 (p<0.001), and usual NRS and PGQ also improved.
- Interactions between ASLR and belt use were not significant.
- 82% of women reported improvement on the PGII.
Limitations
- Observational cohort with no control or comparison group, so improvement cannot be firmly attributed to the belt.
- Small single-center sample of 63 women, limiting generalizability.
- Some natural change in pregnancy-related pain over time cannot be separated from any belt effect.
- The active straight leg raise score did not predict 4-week pain outcomes, so it cannot identify who will benefit.
Why it matters
- For patients
- If you have pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain, a sacroiliac joint belt may ease pain and make daily movement easier, and it appears safe to try.
- For clinicians
- A SIJ belt is a reasonable, safe addition to multimodal care for posterior pregnancy-related PGP, but the active straight leg raise should not be used to predict who will respond.
- For readers
- This single-group study suggests benefit from a SIJ belt but lacks a control group, so the size of the true effect remains uncertain.
Source
doi:10.1002/pmrj.12591
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the sacroiliac & pelvic girdle special tests.
More Sacroiliac & Pelvic Girdle studies
- Reframing beliefs and instilling facts for contemporary management of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle painPrimary study
- Effects of mobilization treatment on sacroiliac joint dysfunction syndromePrimary study
- Diagnostic accuracy of clusters of pain provocation tests for detecting sacroiliac joint pain: systematic review with meta-analysisMeta-analysis
- High-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation (HVLA) does not alter three-dimensional position of sacroiliac joint in healthy men: a quasi-experimental studyPrimary study
- Changing the narrative in diagnosis and management of pain in the sacroiliac joint areaPrimary study
- The sacroiliac joint: victim or culprit?Primary study