PhysioHub

Long-term follow-up of exercise interventions aimed at preventing falls in older people living in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our take

Do exercise programmes designed to prevent falls keep working for community-dwelling older adults beyond the first year, and for how long?

This meta-analysis of 24 studies (7818 participants) found that falls prevention exercise programmes keep reducing falls beyond the usual 12-month mark, cutting the rate of falls by about 21% and the number of fallers by about 17% out to two years. The benefit faded after two years, where the 3 longer studies pooled showed no significant effect, though only a handful of trials followed people that long.

SupportsRead paper
Meta-analysis7,818 ParticipantsModerate evidence

Key points

  1. Pooled across studies, exercise lowered the rate of falls beyond 12 months by 21% (rate ratio 0.79) and the risk of being a faller by 17% (risk ratio 0.83).
  2. Gait, balance and functional training was the core ingredient, used in 20 of 24 studies, and drove most of the benefit.
  3. Programmes lasting 6 to 12 months were the most effective, cutting rate and risk of falling by about a third.
  4. The protective effect appears to last up to roughly two years after the intervention, then declines, but very few trials looked beyond that.
  5. Single interventions of strength training alone or general walking were not effective for reducing falls.

How it was conducted

Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, cohort studies and secondary analyses with follow-up beyond 12 months
Search
MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, psycINFO, PEDro and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2017; 24 studies, 28 comparisons
Participants
7818 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and over (79% women); no specific medical conditions
Intervention
Single or multiple component fall-prevention exercise vs usual care, placebo or non-exercise control
Outcomes
Rate of falls (rate ratio) and number of people falling (risk ratio), random effects model
Analysis
Generic inverse variance random effects in RevMan; I-squared for heterogeneity; Cochrane risk of bias tool

What they found

  • Rate of falls beyond 12 months: RaR 0.79 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.88; 23 studies, 6250 participants), a 21% reduction, I-squared 60%.
  • Risk of falling beyond 12 months: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.92; 18 studies, 4690 participants), a 17% reduction, I-squared 55%.
  • Multiple component exercise: RaR 0.82 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) and RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.96).
  • Exercise lasting 6 to 12 months: RaR 0.67 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.80) and RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.85).
  • Beyond 24 months: no significant effect on rate (RaR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.06; 3 studies) or risk (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.03; 2 studies).

Limitations

  • Moderate to substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity means results should be read with caution.
  • Nearly half the studies had methodological weaknesses, so effects may be overestimated.
  • Nine studies used retrospective self-reported falls data, prone to recall bias, rather than prospective diaries.
  • Only three studies followed participants beyond two years, so the long-term picture is uncertain.

Why it matters

For patients
Sticking with a balance and strength exercise programme can keep lowering your chance of falling for up to about two years.
For clinicians
Prescribe multi-component, balance-focused programmes of at least six months, and consider ongoing exercise since benefits fade over time.
For readers
Falls prevention exercise has durable benefits, but the evidence for protection past two years is thin.

Source

doi:10.1016/j.physio.2018.09.002

Read the original paper

More Older Adults & Falls studies