Physiotherapists' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain influence their clinical decisions and advice
Our take
Do physiotherapists' own beliefs about low back pain influence the clinical advice and treatment decisions they give to patients?
Physiotherapists in this Swiss survey held mostly helpful beliefs about low back pain overall, but unhelpful beliefs about back protection and the special nature of back pain were common and were clearly linked to recommending movement avoidance and passive treatments rather than active self-management.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study288 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Mean Back-PAQ score of 82.7 (out of 170) indicated generally helpful beliefs, but protection and special-nature themes scored highest for unhelpful beliefs
- Unhelpful beliefs were significantly associated with clinical decisions toward back protection and movement avoidance (r = -0.47, p < 0.001)
- Physiotherapists with more experience, current disabling low back pain, or no MSK specialty had more unhelpful beliefs
- Only 23.3% of physiotherapists gave fully guideline-consistent advice about loading the back without adding protective caveats
- Educational strategies targeting physiotherapists' own misconceptions are needed before guideline implementation can succeed
How it was conducted
- Design
- Cross-sectional survey
- Participants
- 288 French-speaking Swiss physiotherapists, recruited via snowball sampling (Dec 2018 - Mar 2019)
- Beliefs measure
- Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ): 34 items, score 34-170, higher = more unhelpful beliefs
- Clinical decisions measure
- Clinical vignette depicting a young woman with acute low back pain; 5 scored questions on activity, work, bed-rest, treatment, and protective advice
- Analysis
- Spearman correlations, independent t-tests, and multiple linear regression; significance level alpha < 0.05
What they found
- Mean Back-PAQ score: 82.7 (SD 17.2); general population mean ~113, patients mean ~120
- Individual characteristics explained 18.2% of variance in Back-PAQ score (F(7,280) = 10.109, p < 0.001)
- Physiotherapists with current disabling low back pain had mean Back-PAQ score of 96.82 vs 81.18 for those without (p < 0.001)
- MSK specialty associated with lower (more helpful) Back-PAQ score: 81.29 vs 85.91 (p = 0.03)
- Total vignette score (mean 2.8 out of 5, SD 1.3) was negatively correlated with Back-PAQ score (r = -0.47, p < 0.001)
- 53.1% recommended work limitation toward avoidance; Back-PAQ mean 87.23 vs 77.57 for no limitation (difference 9.66, 95% CI 5.81-13.5, p < 0.001)
- 49.0% recommended bed rest toward avoidance; Back-PAQ mean 86.59 vs 78.97 (difference 7.62, 95% CI 3.72-11.51, p < 0.001)
- 68.8% gave protective posture advice; associated Back-PAQ mean 89.09 vs 68.64 for those who did not (difference 20.45, 95% CI 16.85-24.04, p < 0.001)
- Only 23.3% selected the two fully guideline-consistent back-loading advice statements without adding any protective advice
- 85.1% chose progressive exercises as a first treatment; not choosing exercises was associated with higher (more unhelpful) Back-PAQ score (mean 89.95 vs 81.43, p = 0.003)
- Electrotherapy use (19.8% of respondents) associated with Back-PAQ mean 94.25 vs 79.85 for non-users (difference 14.39, 95% CI 9.66-19.12, p < 0.001)
Limitations
- Non-probabilistic snowball sampling may introduce self-selection bias and limits generalisability to all Swiss physiotherapists
- Response rate cannot be calculated because the total reach of the invitation chain is unknown
- Clinical vignettes measure intended rather than actual clinical behaviour
- Two of the five vignette questions were newly developed for this study and their measurement properties have not been independently validated
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients may receive inconsistent advice, hearing both encouragement to stay active and warnings to protect the back, depending on their physiotherapist's own beliefs.
- For clinicians
- Physiotherapists should reflect on their own beliefs about back vulnerability and protection, as these beliefs demonstrably shape the advice they give and may reinforce unhelpful fear-avoidance patterns in patients.
- For readers
- This study highlights that guideline uptake for low back pain management requires directly addressing clinician beliefs, not just distributing guidelines.
Source
doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102382
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the lumbar spine & low back special tests.
More Lumbar Spine & Low Back studies
- Immediate physical therapy is beneficial for adolescent athletes with active lumbar spondylolysis: a multicentre RCTRCT
- Subgrouping non-specific low back pain based on spinal marker trajectory data: an unsupervised machine learning approachPrimary study
- "It's hard to trust an individual, it's easier to trust an image": patients with low back pain want imaging as a means of coping with uncertaintyPrimary study
- MRI screening for lumbar bone stress injuries in young male cricket fast bowlers: a 15-year retrospective cohort studyCohort study
- Active and passive physical therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysisMeta-analysis
- The identification of pain phenotypes in individuals with low back pain in response to dynamic resistance exercisePrimary study