Epidural steroid injection for lumbar disc herniation in NFL athletes
The short answer
Can an epidural steroid injection help a professional football player with a herniated lumbar disc get back on the field?
In a highly selected group of NFL players with an acute herniated lumbar disc, epidural steroid injections returned athletes to play 89% of the time with very little lost playing time and no reported complications. This is an uncontrolled retrospective case series, so the findings should not be generalized to non-athletes.
SupportsRead paper
Primary study17 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- 17 NFL players received 37 injections across 27 distinct disc herniation episodes from 2003 to 2010.
- 89% of episodes (24 of 27) returned to play, losing on average only 2.8 practices and 0.6 games after the injection.
- A sequestered (fragmented) disc on MRI and weakness on physical exam were the factors linked to failure of injection therapy.
- Three of the four players who needed a repeat injection for the same episode ultimately failed conservative care and needed surgery.
- No complications were reported, and no player who returned to play had any residual weakness or sensation loss.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Retrospective case series from one professional American football team, 2003 to 2010, with IRB approval
- Participants
- 17 NFL players (average age 25 years, range 22 to 32) with MRI-confirmed acute lumbar disc herniation and incapacitating pain
- Intervention
- Epidural injection of 80 to 160 mg triamcinolone plus lidocaine or bupivacaine, transforaminal (81%) or interlaminar (19%)
- Primary outcome
- Success defined as return to play in a professional football game
- Secondary outcome
- Risk factors for failure, tested via logistic regression and chi-square (P < 0.05 significant)
What they found
- Success rate of returning to play per herniation episode was 89% (24 of 27 episodes).
- Average loss after injection was 2.8 practices (range 0 to 12) and 0.6 games (range 0 to 2).
- After 27 of the 37 injections, the player returned to play without missing any games.
- Disc sequestration on MRI was a significant risk factor for failure (P = 0.01).
- Weakness on physical examination was a significant risk factor for failure (P = 0.002).
- Presenting symptoms (P = 0.96), anatomic level (P = 0.47), presence of spondylolysis (P = 0.19), and injection technique (P = 0.55) did not significantly affect return to play.
- Disc morphology distribution: 23 protrusions, 2 extrusions, 2 sequestrations; episodes occurred at L4-5 (15), L5-S1 (11), and L3-4 (1).
- Four players required a repeat injection for the same episode, and 3 of those 4 ultimately failed conservative management and required surgery.
- After successful return, 13 players played an average of 2.8 NFL seasons (range 1 to 6), and 10 were still actively playing as of the end of the 2010 season.
Limitations
- No control group, so some players might have returned to play without injection.
- No long-term follow-up with physical examination or repeat MRI, and patient pain was not rated.
- Other concurrent treatments such as NSAIDs and physical therapy were not tracked, so their contribution cannot be separated out.
- Small, single-team, highly selected professional-athlete sample that cannot be generalized to the general population.
Why it matters
- For patients
- For elite athletes with an acute disc herniation, an epidural steroid injection may offer fast pain relief and a quick return to activity, but ordinary patients should know most disc pain resolves with conservative care within 12 weeks.
- For clinicians
- Consider epidural steroid injection as a low-complication option in high-demand athletes, but expect lower success when the disc is sequestered on MRI or the patient shows weakness on exam.
- For readers
- This is a small uncontrolled case series showing favorable return-to-play outcomes, useful as preliminary evidence in athletes but not as proof of efficacy for the general population.
Source
doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31822d7599
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the lumbar spine & low back special tests.
More Lumbar Spine & Low Back studies
- Immediate physical therapy is beneficial for adolescent athletes with active lumbar spondylolysis: a multicentre RCTRCT
- Subgrouping non-specific low back pain based on spinal marker trajectory data: an unsupervised machine learning approachPrimary study
- "It's hard to trust an individual, it's easier to trust an image": patients with low back pain want imaging as a means of coping with uncertaintyPrimary study
- MRI screening for lumbar bone stress injuries in young male cricket fast bowlers: a 15-year retrospective cohort studyCohort study
- Active and passive physical therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysisMeta-analysis
- The identification of pain phenotypes in individuals with low back pain in response to dynamic resistance exercisePrimary study