Chronic localized back pain due to entrapment of cutaneous branches of posterior rami of the thoracic nerves (POCNES): a case series on diagnosis and management
The verdict
Can chronic localized back pain caused by a trapped nerve (POCNES) be diagnosed and treated with injections or surgery?
In a small series of 14 patients, a step-up approach using lidocaine injections followed by surgical nerve removal provided long-term pain relief in 57% of cases. POCNES should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic localized back pain when somatosensory disturbances are present over the painful area.
SupportsRead paper
Case series14 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- 81% of patients had more than 50% pain reduction after a diagnostic lidocaine injection
- Long-term success (VRS 1-2) was achieved in 57% of the full study population at median 29 months follow-up
- Neurectomy succeeded in 7 of 11 operated patients (64%) at long-term follow-up
- Median diagnostic delay before POCNES was identified was 22 months
- 6 of 14 patients had previously had a neurectomy for the related anterior nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES)
How it was conducted
- Design
- Prospective case series at two Dutch tertiary-referral surgery centers
- Participants
- 14 patients (12 female, 2 male) meeting at least 4 of 5 predefined POCNES diagnostic criteria; median age 26 years (range 18-73)
- Observation period
- January 2013 to September 2016
- Diagnostic intervention
- 2-5 mL 1% lidocaine injection below the thoracolumbar fascia at the point of maximal pain
- Primary outcome
- More than 50% reduction on NRS (0-10) after injection; long-term satisfaction on VRS (1-5)
- Surgical procedure
- Neurectomy of the cutaneous branch of the posterior ramus via a 5 cm transverse incision over the pain point
What they found
- NRS pain scores dropped from median 8.0 (IQR 7.0-8.0) pre-injection to median 3.0 (IQR 1.5-3.5) post-injection (P<0.001) in 13 of 14 patients
- 10 of 13 assessed patients (81%) reported more than 50% pain reduction after the diagnostic injection
- At 6-week post-operative review, 7 of 11 neurectomy patients (64%) were very satisfied or satisfied (VRS 1-2) and 3 (27%) reported attenuated pain (VRS 3); surgery was unsuccessful in 1 (VRS 4)
- At long-term follow-up (median 29 months, range 5-48 months), 7 of 11 operated patients (64%) remained satisfied (VRS 1-2)
- Overall long-term efficacy across the entire study population was 57% (8 of 14 patients achieved VRS 1-2)
- All patients had a DN4 score of at least 3 (median 3, range 3-5), confirming neuropathic pain
- Positive pinch test was found in 86% (12 of 14) of patients
- In half of cases (7 of 14), the point of maximal pain corresponded with the T12 dermatome
Limitations
- Very small sample of 14 patients from two tertiary referral centers limits generalizability and introduces selection bias
- No control group or comparison with standard back pain treatments
- Retrospective data accrual and lack of objective neurophysiological tests (laser evoked potentials, quantitative sensory testing, nerve biopsy)
- Results may not apply to general clinical practice as the diagnosing centers have specialized expertise in neuropathic trunk pain syndromes
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients with chronic localized back pain that has not responded to standard investigations and treatment should ask their doctor whether nerve entrapment (POCNES) might be the cause, especially if there is a small, predictable tender spot with abnormal skin sensation nearby.
- For clinicians
- POCNES should be included in the differential diagnosis of chronic localized back pain; a structured clinical assessment followed by a diagnostic lidocaine injection at the tender point can confirm the diagnosis, and neurectomy offers durable relief in roughly two thirds of surgical candidates.
- For readers
- This is a small, first-in-kind case series describing a newly recognized neuropathic back pain syndrome; evidence is preliminary and larger comparative studies are needed before routine clinical adoption.
Source
doi:10.2147/jpr.s178492
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the lumbar spine & low back special tests.
More Lumbar Spine & Low Back studies
- Immediate physical therapy is beneficial for adolescent athletes with active lumbar spondylolysis: a multicentre RCTRCT
- Subgrouping non-specific low back pain based on spinal marker trajectory data: an unsupervised machine learning approachPrimary study
- "It's hard to trust an individual, it's easier to trust an image": patients with low back pain want imaging as a means of coping with uncertaintyPrimary study
- MRI screening for lumbar bone stress injuries in young male cricket fast bowlers: a 15-year retrospective cohort studyCohort study
- Active and passive physical therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysisMeta-analysis
- The identification of pain phenotypes in individuals with low back pain in response to dynamic resistance exercisePrimary study