Postoperative rehabilitation for arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement
The verdict
After hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, how should physical therapy be structured to recover safely?
A four-phase rehabilitation approach is favored after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, but no single protocol is agreed upon and timelines, precautions, and exercises vary widely across studies.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary studyLimited evidence
Key points
- Rehabilitation is commonly organized into four phases, from protecting the surgical repair through to returning to competitive sport.
- Phase 1 focuses on protecting the repair, reducing pain and inflammation, and reaching roughly 80% of range of motion.
- Phase 2 advances to full weightbearing and functional independence, Phase 3 builds strength and endurance for recreational activity, and Phase 4 targets return to competitive sport.
- Protocols are heterogeneous, with no unanimous agreement on timelines, precautions, or specific exercises.
- Clearer definitions are needed to help patients return to activity safely and without unnecessary delay.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Narrative contemporary review of postoperative physical therapy protocols
- Topic
- Rehabilitation after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS)
- Structure reviewed
- Four-phase rehabilitation framework
- Phase 1 detail
- 4 to 6 weeks from postoperative day 1, partial weightbearing, range-of-motion restrictions after labral repair, optional CPM or brace, isometrics, gait normalization
What they found
- Phase 1 spans roughly 4 to 6 weeks starting postoperative day 1 and aims for about 80% of range of motion.
- Phase 2 targets full weightbearing and functional independence; Phase 3 targets strength and endurance for recreational activity; Phase 4 targets return to competitive sport.
Limitations
- This is a narrative review rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, so the included studies were not pooled or formally appraised.
- Protocols across studies are heterogeneous, with no agreed-upon timelines, precautions, or exercises.
- The review reports no patient-level outcome statistics such as effect sizes or success rates.
- Phase definitions remain unclear, limiting direct comparison and standardized application.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Expect a staged recovery moving from protecting the hip to building strength and eventually returning to sport, but understand that exact timelines differ between programs.
- For clinicians
- A four-phase progression is a reasonable framework, but the lack of a standardized protocol means rehabilitation should be individualized and based on functional milestones.
- For readers
- There is broad agreement on a phased recovery model after FAIS hip arthroscopy, yet the field still lacks a consistent, well-defined protocol.
Source
doi:10.1007/s12178-023-09850-2
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the hip & groin special tests.
More Hip & Groin studies
- An examination of imaging findings in patients with clinically diagnosed gluteal tendinopathyPrimary studySummary2025
- Reconsidering exercise selection with EMG: poor agreement between ranking hip exercises with EMGPrimary studySummary2025
- The influence of hip extensor and lumbar spine extensor strength on lumbar spine loadingPrimary studySummary2022
- Relationship between hip and groin pain and hip range of motion in amateur soccer and Australian rules football playersPrimary studySummary2024
- Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in middle-aged individuals is strongly associated with hip OAPrimary studySummary2024
- Hip adduction and abduction strength in different test positions and their relationshipPrimary studySummary2024