Combining results from hip impingement and range of motion tests can increase diagnostic accuracy in patients with FAI syndrome
The short answer
How accurate are physical examination tests for diagnosing hip impingement (FAI syndrome), and should they be combined?
No single hip test is accurate on its own. Impingement tests like AIMT and FADIR are good at ruling FAI out, while limited internal rotation is better at ruling it in, so combining tests gives the most useful picture.
Mixed pictureRead paper
Primary study81 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- 81 patients were examined by two raters, with FAI diagnosis confirmed by symptoms, CAM or pincer morphology, and a positive intra-articular block.
- Impingement tests AIMT, FADIR, and FABER showed good inter-rater agreement (kappa above 0.6).
- AIMT and FADIR were sensitive (about 80%) but not specific (about 25%), so they help rule FAI out, not confirm it.
- Limited passive internal rotation in neutral was specific (94%) but not sensitive (29%), so it helps confirm FAI when present.
- Pairing a ruling-out test with a ruling-in test increases overall diagnostic accuracy.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability study (Level of evidence II)
- Participants
- 81 patients assessed for FAI syndrome
- Raters
- Two independent raters performed the clinical tests
- Reference standard
- FAI diagnosis required symptoms, CAM or pincer morphology, and a positive intra-articular block
- Tests assessed
- Impingement tests (AIMT, FADIR, FABER) and passive range of motion tests
What they found
- AIMT, FADIR, and FABER showed inter-rater agreement kappa above 0.6.
- Passive range of motion tests, except extension, showed inter-rater agreement kappa above 0.4.
- AIMT and FADIR had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of about 25%, supporting use to rule out FAI.
- Passive internal rotation in neutral position had sensitivity of 29% and specificity of 94%, supporting use to rule in FAI.
Limitations
- Single-center sample of 81 patients limits the precision of accuracy estimates.
- Specificity of the impingement tests was low (about 25%), so a positive result alone is not informative.
- The most informative ruling-in test (limited internal rotation) missed most cases due to low sensitivity (29%).
- The reported abstract-level data give limited detail on confidence intervals around the accuracy estimates.
Why it matters
- For patients
- A single positive hip test does not confirm you have impingement, so your clinician will combine several tests and imaging before deciding.
- For clinicians
- Use AIMT or FADIR to help rule FAI out and limited internal rotation in neutral to help rule it in, rather than relying on one test.
- For readers
- This study shows why combining clinical tests, rather than trusting any single one, improves diagnostic accuracy for hip impingement.
Source
doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06005-5
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the hip & groin special tests.
More Hip & Groin studies
- Hip strengthening exercise compared to standard rehabilitation after revision hip replacement: a multicentre RCTRCT
- Landing stability during the single-leg drop jump in footballers with hip and/or groin painPrimary study
- Reliability of tests assessing hamstring function during hip extension and their associations with maximal sprinting speed: a cross-sectional studyCross-sectional
- Heavy slow resistance training combined with patient education in patients with gluteal tendinopathy: a feasibility studyPrimary study
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a cycling and education intervention versus usual physiotherapy care for hip osteoarthritis (CLEAT): a pragmatic RCTRCT
- Effects of a weighted vs unweighted low-dose isometric Copenhagen adduction exercise programme on hip adduction and abduction strength: an RCT in senior-level playersRCT