An examination of imaging findings in patients with clinically diagnosed gluteal tendinopathy
In short
In people clinically diagnosed with gluteal tendinopathy, what do MRI and ultrasound scans actually show, and do the imaging findings explain how bad their symptoms are?
Imaging of clinically diagnosed gluteal tendinopathy reveals a range of tendon and bursal changes, but the severity seen on scans does not fully match how severe a patient's symptoms are. Imaging adds information to the clinical diagnosis rather than replacing it.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary studyLimited evidence
Key points
- This was a secondary analysis of imaging data from participants in a randomised clinical trial who already had a clinical diagnosis of gluteal tendinopathy.
- MRI and ultrasound showed a spectrum of gluteal tendon and bursal pathology rather than a single uniform finding.
- In some patients the severity of changes on imaging did not line up with the severity of their symptoms.
- The authors conclude imaging complements the clinical diagnosis but does not fully explain symptom severity.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Secondary analysis of the imaging cohort from a randomised clinical trial
- Participants
- Trial participants with a clinical diagnosis of gluteal tendinopathy
- Imaging modality
- MRI and ultrasound
- Aim
- Describe the MRI and ultrasound findings in this clinically diagnosed group
What they found
- MRI and ultrasound showed a spectrum of gluteal tendon and bursal pathology across participants.
- There was discordance between imaging severity and symptom severity in some patients.
Limitations
- This was a secondary analysis of an existing trial cohort, not a study designed primarily to relate imaging to symptoms.
- The reported findings are descriptive, with no effect sizes, diagnostic accuracy figures, or comparison group reported in the available text.
- Participants were already clinically diagnosed, so the findings may not apply to people with hip pain of uncertain cause.
Why it matters
- For patients
- A scan showing tendon or bursal changes does not by itself tell you how severe your gluteal tendon problem is, so treatment should be guided by your symptoms and clinical assessment, not the scan alone.
- For clinicians
- Use imaging to complement, not replace, the clinical diagnosis of gluteal tendinopathy, and be cautious about reading symptom severity directly off imaging severity.
- For readers
- In clinically diagnosed gluteal tendinopathy, imaging shows varied tendon and bursal pathology that does not reliably track with how bad symptoms are.
Source
doi:10.1007/s00402-025-05964-z
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the hip & groin special tests.
More Hip & Groin studies
- Hip strengthening exercise compared to standard rehabilitation after revision hip replacement: a multicentre RCTRCT
- Landing stability during the single-leg drop jump in footballers with hip and/or groin painPrimary study
- Reliability of tests assessing hamstring function during hip extension and their associations with maximal sprinting speed: a cross-sectional studyCross-sectional
- Heavy slow resistance training combined with patient education in patients with gluteal tendinopathy: a feasibility studyPrimary study
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a cycling and education intervention versus usual physiotherapy care for hip osteoarthritis (CLEAT): a pragmatic RCTRCT
- Effects of a weighted vs unweighted low-dose isometric Copenhagen adduction exercise programme on hip adduction and abduction strength: an RCT in senior-level playersRCT