"I could 100% see myself getting hurt if I did it wrong": a qualitative exploration of exercise
The takeaway
How do people with chronic low back pain perceive different types of exercise, and do those perceptions match the current evidence?
People with chronic low back pain strongly favour 'core' exercises as the remedy for their pain and view spinal bending and external load as dangerous, even though current evidence does not support these distinctions. Healthcare practitioners, sometimes without realising it, reinforce these unhelpful beliefs through the exercises they prescribe.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study16 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- 'Core' or trunk-targeted exercises were ranked most beneficial and the bird dog was preferred over the deadlift and Jefferson curl by nearly all participants
- Spinal flexion (bending) was widely perceived as harmful or risky technique, despite evidence that bending does not cause chronic low back pain
- External load was feared by most participants because they believed it increased injury risk when technique was imperfect
- Participants drew a sharp line between 'rehabilitation' exercises (for pain relief) and 'gym' exercises (for general health), which created barriers to returning to enjoyable activity
- Distrust of healthcare practitioners arose when recommended exercises did not relieve pain, and trust was higher when the practitioner was seen as an exercise expert
How it was conducted
- Design
- Qualitative study using online semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis (critical realism and social constructivism lens)
- Participants
- 16 adults with self-reported low back pain lasting more than 3 months (4 female, 12 male; mean age 39.6 +/- 13.8 years)
- Setting
- Online via Zoom; convenience sample recruited around UNSW Sydney and via social media, April to August 2023
- Procedure
- Participants discussed their pain history and exercise beliefs, then watched the interviewer perform a deadlift, Jefferson curl, and bird dog without naming the exercises, and rated each for benefit in chronic low back pain
- Analysis
- Six-stage reflexive thematic analysis using NVivo 12; theoretical saturation guided cessation of recruitment
- Measures
- Oswestry Disability Index, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (physical activity subsection), and Visual Analogue Scale for pain
What they found
- All 16 participants viewed all three exercises as beneficial for general health, but perceived benefit for pain relief varied markedly across exercises
- Of 15 participants who ranked exercises, the bird dog was ranked most beneficial for chronic low back pain and the Jefferson curl least beneficial
- Mean disability score (Oswestry Disability Index) was 15.88 +/- 10.41 and mean fear avoidance score (FABQpa) was 10.5 +/- 5.34
- Spinal flexion was perceived as harmful or poor technique by the majority of participants regardless of personal experience with bending exercises
- External load was perceived as increasing injury risk by most participants, with perceived capacity being the key moderator of that fear
- Participants who had received conflicting advice from multiple healthcare practitioners showed heightened distrust, particularly when recommended exercises worsened their pain
Limitations
- Small sample of 16 participants, all from one city in Australia, limits generalisability
- The lead interviewer (AN) was a novice qualitative researcher, and social desirability bias may have influenced participant responses
- Online format (Zoom) prevented participants from physically performing the exercises as originally planned, potentially limiting the depth of experiential data
- Member checking (returning transcripts to participants for validation) was not conducted due to time constraints, which may reduce analytical rigour
Why it matters
- For patients
- If you have chronic low back pain, it is worth knowing that the common belief that bending or lifting weights will damage your back is not well supported by evidence, and that all forms of exercise, not just 'core' work, can be part of safe and effective management.
- For clinicians
- The exercises you prescribe carry implicit messages; prescribing only core-specific exercises may unintentionally reinforce fear of movement and load in patients, so pairing exercise choice with explicit education about spinal bending and loading is important.
- For readers
- This study shows that patients' exercise beliefs are shaped as much by cultural assumptions and clinician behaviour as by their own experience, and that closing the gap between perceived and actual exercise risk should be a priority in chronic low back pain rehabilitation.
Source
doi:10.1080/09638288.2024.2400592
Read the original paperMore Exercise & Loading studies
- Competency and confidence in qualitative biomechanical assessment of exercise technique among exercise professionalsPrimary study
- Effect of adherence to exercise-based injury prevention programmes on the risk of sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTsMeta-analysis
- Are maximal power and maximal aerobic capacity in older and very old adults dependent on their physical activityPrimary study
- Hamstring muscle architecture and microstructure changes following Nordic hamstring exercise trainingPrimary study
- Resistance training in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy, delivery and fetal outcomesMeta-analysis
- Practical recommendations on stretching exercise: a Delphi consensus statement of international expertsConsensus