PhysioHub

High intensity exercise for 3 months reduces disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): a multicenter randomised trial of 100 patients

The verdict

Does high-intensity exercise reduce disease activity and improve cardiovascular health in people with axial spondyloarthritis?

A 3-month programme of high-intensity cardiorespiratory and strength exercise significantly reduced disease activity, pain, fatigue, and stiffness in axial spondyloarthritis patients compared to standard care. The programme also improved physical function and cardiovascular fitness without triggering disease flares.

SupportsRead paper
RCT100 ParticipantsModerate evidence

Key points

  1. ASDAS disease activity score fell by 0.6 points more in the exercise group than controls (p<0.001), and BASDAI fell by 1.2 points more (p<0.001)
  2. 52% of exercisers achieved a 20% improvement in disease activity versus only 10% of controls; the number needed to treat was 3
  3. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) improved by 2.7 mL/kg/min more in the exercise group (p<0.001), suggesting meaningful cardiovascular benefit
  4. Physical function (BASFI) improved by 0.9 points more in exercisers (27% vs 11% change, p<0.001)
  5. High-intensity exercise was safe: no disease flares were recorded and only minor adverse events occurred

How it was conducted

Design
Assessor-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) across 4 rheumatology centres in Norway and Sweden
Participants
100 adults aged 18-70 with axSpA, moderate to high disease activity (BASDAI >=3.5), and no regular exercise in the past 6 months
Intervention
3 supervised sessions per week for 12 weeks: 2 physiotherapist-led high-intensity cardiorespiratory and strength sessions plus 1 independent cardio session
Control
Standard care with instruction to maintain usual physical activity level
Primary outcomes
Disease activity measured by ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI at 3 months
Analysis
Intention-to-treat using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values and study centre

What they found

  • ASDAS: estimated mean group difference -0.6 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.3), p<0.001; exercise group changed from 2.6 to 1.9 vs control group 2.7 to 2.6
  • BASDAI: estimated mean group difference -1.2 (95% CI -1.8 to -0.7), p<0.001; exercise group changed from 4.9 to 3.3 vs control 5.3 to 4.8
  • ASAS20 response: 52% (25/48) in exercise group vs 10% (5/49) in control; absolute increased benefit 42% (95% CI 25% to 58%), NNT 3 (95% CI 2 to 4)
  • ASAS40 response: 38% (18/48) in exercise group vs 4% (2/49) in control; absolute increased benefit 33% (95% CI 19% to 48%), NNT 3 (95% CI 2 to 5)
  • VO2peak: mean group difference +2.7 mL/kg/min (95% CI 1.6 to 3.8), p<0.001; 8.2% difference in change between groups
  • Physical function BASFI: mean group difference -0.9 (95% CI -1.3 to -0.4), p<0.001
  • Spinal mobility BASMI: mean group difference -0.3 (95% CI -0.5 to -0.06), p=0.016
  • Waist circumference: mean group difference -1.7 cm (95% CI -3.2 to -0.2), p=0.031 (in those with elevated baseline waist)
  • CRP: significant group difference in favour of exercise group (p=0.041, Mann-Whitney); ESR difference not significant (p=0.066)
  • Fatigue sub-score (BASDAI): group difference -1.4 (95% CI -2.2 to -0.6), p<0.001
  • Morning stiffness sub-score: group difference -1.7 (95% CI -2.4 to -1.0), p<0.001

Limitations

  • No blinding of participants was possible, so a psychological (attention) effect on patient-reported outcomes cannot be ruled out
  • Only short-term (3-month) effects were measured; long-term sustainability is unknown
  • Motivated patients may have self-selected into the study, potentially limiting generalisability to less motivated populations
  • About 40% of participants were on stable TNF-inhibitor treatment, which may have influenced the observed treatment effects

Why it matters

For patients
People with axial spondyloarthritis can safely perform high-intensity exercise and expect meaningful reductions in pain, fatigue, stiffness, and improvements in their ability to function day-to-day.
For clinicians
High-intensity cardiorespiratory and strength training should be considered a core component of axSpA management alongside pharmacotherapy, offering disease-modifying and cardiovascular benefits with a low number needed to treat (3).
For readers
This RCT directly challenges the longstanding clinical concern that vigorous exercise is harmful in axSpA, providing robust evidence that it is both safe and effective.

Source

doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099943

Read the original paper

More Exercise & Loading studies