High intensity exercise for 3 months reduces disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): a multicenter randomised trial of 100 patients
The verdict
Does high-intensity exercise reduce disease activity and improve cardiovascular health in people with axial spondyloarthritis?
A 3-month programme of high-intensity cardiorespiratory and strength exercise significantly reduced disease activity, pain, fatigue, and stiffness in axial spondyloarthritis patients compared to standard care. The programme also improved physical function and cardiovascular fitness without triggering disease flares.
SupportsRead paper
RCT100 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- ASDAS disease activity score fell by 0.6 points more in the exercise group than controls (p<0.001), and BASDAI fell by 1.2 points more (p<0.001)
- 52% of exercisers achieved a 20% improvement in disease activity versus only 10% of controls; the number needed to treat was 3
- Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) improved by 2.7 mL/kg/min more in the exercise group (p<0.001), suggesting meaningful cardiovascular benefit
- Physical function (BASFI) improved by 0.9 points more in exercisers (27% vs 11% change, p<0.001)
- High-intensity exercise was safe: no disease flares were recorded and only minor adverse events occurred
How it was conducted
- Design
- Assessor-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) across 4 rheumatology centres in Norway and Sweden
- Participants
- 100 adults aged 18-70 with axSpA, moderate to high disease activity (BASDAI >=3.5), and no regular exercise in the past 6 months
- Intervention
- 3 supervised sessions per week for 12 weeks: 2 physiotherapist-led high-intensity cardiorespiratory and strength sessions plus 1 independent cardio session
- Control
- Standard care with instruction to maintain usual physical activity level
- Primary outcomes
- Disease activity measured by ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI at 3 months
- Analysis
- Intention-to-treat using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values and study centre
What they found
- ASDAS: estimated mean group difference -0.6 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.3), p<0.001; exercise group changed from 2.6 to 1.9 vs control group 2.7 to 2.6
- BASDAI: estimated mean group difference -1.2 (95% CI -1.8 to -0.7), p<0.001; exercise group changed from 4.9 to 3.3 vs control 5.3 to 4.8
- ASAS20 response: 52% (25/48) in exercise group vs 10% (5/49) in control; absolute increased benefit 42% (95% CI 25% to 58%), NNT 3 (95% CI 2 to 4)
- ASAS40 response: 38% (18/48) in exercise group vs 4% (2/49) in control; absolute increased benefit 33% (95% CI 19% to 48%), NNT 3 (95% CI 2 to 5)
- VO2peak: mean group difference +2.7 mL/kg/min (95% CI 1.6 to 3.8), p<0.001; 8.2% difference in change between groups
- Physical function BASFI: mean group difference -0.9 (95% CI -1.3 to -0.4), p<0.001
- Spinal mobility BASMI: mean group difference -0.3 (95% CI -0.5 to -0.06), p=0.016
- Waist circumference: mean group difference -1.7 cm (95% CI -3.2 to -0.2), p=0.031 (in those with elevated baseline waist)
- CRP: significant group difference in favour of exercise group (p=0.041, Mann-Whitney); ESR difference not significant (p=0.066)
- Fatigue sub-score (BASDAI): group difference -1.4 (95% CI -2.2 to -0.6), p<0.001
- Morning stiffness sub-score: group difference -1.7 (95% CI -2.4 to -1.0), p<0.001
Limitations
- No blinding of participants was possible, so a psychological (attention) effect on patient-reported outcomes cannot be ruled out
- Only short-term (3-month) effects were measured; long-term sustainability is unknown
- Motivated patients may have self-selected into the study, potentially limiting generalisability to less motivated populations
- About 40% of participants were on stable TNF-inhibitor treatment, which may have influenced the observed treatment effects
Why it matters
- For patients
- People with axial spondyloarthritis can safely perform high-intensity exercise and expect meaningful reductions in pain, fatigue, stiffness, and improvements in their ability to function day-to-day.
- For clinicians
- High-intensity cardiorespiratory and strength training should be considered a core component of axSpA management alongside pharmacotherapy, offering disease-modifying and cardiovascular benefits with a low number needed to treat (3).
- For readers
- This RCT directly challenges the longstanding clinical concern that vigorous exercise is harmful in axSpA, providing robust evidence that it is both safe and effective.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099943
Read the original paperMore Exercise & Loading studies
- Competency and confidence in qualitative biomechanical assessment of exercise technique among exercise professionalsPrimary study
- Effect of adherence to exercise-based injury prevention programmes on the risk of sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTsMeta-analysis
- Are maximal power and maximal aerobic capacity in older and very old adults dependent on their physical activityPrimary study
- Hamstring muscle architecture and microstructure changes following Nordic hamstring exercise trainingPrimary study
- Resistance training in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy, delivery and fetal outcomesMeta-analysis
- Practical recommendations on stretching exercise: a Delphi consensus statement of international expertsConsensus