Does a corticosteroid injection plus exercise or exercise alone add to the effect
The upshot
For plantar heel pain, does adding exercise or a corticosteroid injection to simple advice and a heel cup improve outcomes?
Adding heavy-slow resistance exercise or a corticosteroid injection plus exercise to basic advice and a heel cup did not produce clinically meaningful improvements in pain compared with advice and a heel cup alone. All three groups improved substantially over 12 weeks, but no between-group difference reached the pre-specified minimal important difference of 14.1 points.
ChallengesRead paper
Primary study180 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- All three groups achieved clinically meaningful pain improvement by 12 weeks on the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ).
- The combination of injection plus exercise (PAXI) was statistically, but not clinically, superior to advice alone (PA) at 12 weeks (mean difference -9.1 points, below the 14.1-point threshold).
- Exercise alone (PAX) was not superior to advice plus heel cup (PA) at any time point.
- PAXI patients were about twice as likely to reach a satisfactory symptom state by 12 weeks (NNT 4.7 vs PA, 4.1 vs PAX), suggesting a possible short-term benefit of the injection for patients seeking faster relief.
- Differences between groups disappeared by 26 and 52 weeks, with all groups reaching similar pain scores near 80/100.
How it was conducted
- Design
- Three-arm, randomised, single-blinded superiority trial (NCT03804008)
- Participants
- 180 adults with ultrasound-confirmed plantar fasciopathy, heel pain >=3 months, plantar fascia thickness >=4.0 mm, mean VAS >=30/100
- Groups
- PA: advice plus heel cup (n=62); PAX: PA plus heavy-slow resistance heel-raise exercise (n=59); PAXI: PAX plus ultrasound-guided triamcinolone 20 mg/mL injection (n=59)
- Primary outcome
- FHSQ pain domain (0-100) change from baseline to 12 weeks; minimal important difference 14.1 points
- Follow-up
- Baseline, 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks
- Analysis
- Intention-to-treat linear mixed effects model; conclusions pre-specified at 12-week primary endpoint
What they found
- Primary outcome at 12 weeks: PA vs PAXI adjusted mean difference -9.1 (95% CI -16.8 to -1.3; p=0.023), favouring PAXI but below the 14.1-point minimal important difference.
- Primary outcome at 12 weeks: PA vs PAX adjusted mean difference -2.0 (95% CI -9.9 to 5.9; p=0.625), not significant.
- Primary outcome at 12 weeks: PAX vs PAXI adjusted mean difference -7.1 (95% CI -15.2 to 1.0; p=0.084), not significant.
- Over 52 weeks overall: PA vs PAXI adjusted mean difference -5.2 (95% CI -10.4 to -0.1; p=0.045); PA vs PAX -2.4 (95% CI -7.6 to 2.8; p=0.370); PAX vs PAXI -2.9 (95% CI -8.1 to 2.4; p=0.279).
- FHSQ pain scores at 52 weeks: PA mean 81.8 (SD 16.2), PAX mean 81.8 (SD 16.5), PAXI mean 79.4 (SD 21.8) - groups converged.
- Patient Acceptable Symptom State within 12 weeks: 11/62 PA, 8/59 PAX, 21/59 PAXI; risk difference PAXI vs PA 0.21 (NNT=4.7, 95% CI 2.6 to 26.0); PAXI vs PAX 0.25 (NNT=4.1, 95% CI 2.4 to 14.5).
- GROC improved at 12 weeks: PAX vs PA risk difference 0.01 (NNT=13.9, 95% CI -3.7 to 8.0); PAXI vs PA risk difference 0.16 (NNT=6.2, 95% CI -33.5 to 2.8).
- Exercise compliance: PAX 30.9 +-12.4 sessions (74% of prescribed); PAXI 29.9 +-10.4 sessions (71%); no between-group difference (mean difference 1.0 sessions, 95% CI -5.9 to 7.8; p=0.779).
- No association between training sessions performed and FHSQ pain change (r=-0.044; p=0.770).
Limitations
- Patient blinding was impossible given the nature of the interventions, likely introducing expectation bias favouring groups receiving more treatment.
- Approximately one-third of patients did not complete questionnaires at 26 and 52 weeks, reducing statistical power for long-term conclusions.
- About half of participants had prior treatments similar to those studied, meaning many may have been non-responders, potentially underestimating overall treatment effects.
- The minimal important difference was derived from an Australian population and a different measurement context, limiting its direct applicability to this Danish sample.
Why it matters
- For patients
- Most patients with plantar heel pain improved substantially within 12 weeks regardless of whether they received exercise or an injection on top of simple advice and a heel cup, so starting with the simplest approach is a reasonable first step.
- For clinicians
- This trial does not support routinely adding heavy-slow resistance exercise or a corticosteroid injection to initial management; however, an injection combined with exercise may accelerate early symptom relief (NNT approximately 4-5 for satisfactory state at 12 weeks) for patients who need faster improvement.
- For readers
- The study is a well-powered RCT but was single-blinded and conducted in a Danish general-practice setting, which may limit generalisability to other healthcare systems or patient populations.
Source
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106948
Read the original paperMore Exercise & Loading studies
- Competency and confidence in qualitative biomechanical assessment of exercise technique among exercise professionalsPrimary study
- Effect of adherence to exercise-based injury prevention programmes on the risk of sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTsMeta-analysis
- Are maximal power and maximal aerobic capacity in older and very old adults dependent on their physical activityPrimary study
- Hamstring muscle architecture and microstructure changes following Nordic hamstring exercise trainingPrimary study
- Resistance training in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy, delivery and fetal outcomesMeta-analysis
- Practical recommendations on stretching exercise: a Delphi consensus statement of international expertsConsensus