Medial elbow anatomy: a paradigm shift for UCL injury prevention and management
Our take
What is the true anatomy of the medial elbow, and how should the structures around the UCL be understood for better injury prevention and management?
A cadaveric study of 23 elbows identified a previously undescribed tendinous complex at the medial elbow, formed by two tendinous septa together with the brachialis tendon and muscle aponeuroses, which cannot be histologically separated from the joint capsule. These findings suggest the UCL should be reinterpreted as part of this integrated complex rather than as an isolated ligament, with direct implications for rehabilitation, MRI diagnosis, and surgical planning.
DescriptiveRead paper
Primary study23 ParticipantsLimited evidence
Key points
- Two tendinous septa exist between PT-FDS and FDS-FCU muscles, forming an integrated tendinous complex with the brachialis tendon and deep aponeuroses
- The joint capsule merges with the tendinous complex distally at the sublime tubercle with approximately 7 mm attachment width, wider than previously reported
- The PT, FDS, FCU, and brachialis muscles likely work as a coordinated unit rather than independently to stabilize the medial elbow
- The MRI T-sign can be classified into three types based on the newly defined attachment widths: type 1 under 1 mm (normal variant), type 2 of 1-7 mm (capsular detachment), type 3 over 7 mm (tendinous complex detachment)
- Rehabilitation programs such as the Thrower's Ten may need revision to include finger flexor exercises given the FDS role in the tendinous complex
How it was conducted
- Design
- Descriptive cadaveric anatomical study
- Specimens
- 23 embalmed cadaveric elbows from 16 Japanese donors (8 male, 8 female; mean age at death 83 years, range 49-99)
- Analysis methods
- Macroscopic dissection and measurement (17 elbows), Masson trichrome histology (6 elbows), micro-CT with radiopaque markers (7 elbows)
- Primary aim
- Characterize medial elbow tendinous structures and joint capsule in relation to the UCL
- Reliability
- Interclass correlation coefficient 0.89-0.96 for measurements
What they found
- Capsular attachment width at anterior border of tendinous complex (Ca): 6.4 +/- 0.5 mm
- Capsular attachment width at posterior border of tendinous complex (Cp): 6.2 +/- 0.4 mm
- Maximum capsular attachment width at sublime tubercle (Cm): 7.3 +/- 0.6 mm
- Distance from anterior border of tendinous complex to point of maximum capsular attachment width (Da): 3.6 +/- 0.5 mm
- Distance from posterior border of tendinous complex to point of maximum capsular attachment width (Dp): 2.8 +/- 0.4 mm
- Length of ulnar attachment at anterior border of tendinous complex (La): 26.4 +/- 1.3 mm
- Cartilage surface width without capsular attachment was too small to measure (approximately 0-1 mm)
- Histology confirmed the two TS, brachialis intramuscular tendon, and deep FDS and FCU aponeuroses could not be separated from each other
- Micro-CT confirmed anterior borders of the two TS corresponded to the anterodistal and posterodistal slopes of the medial epicondyle and the anterior and posterior bases of the sublime tubercle
Limitations
- Purely anatomical cadaveric study with no biomechanical or clinical outcome data
- All cadavers were elderly (mean 83 years), not matched to the peak age of overhead throwing athletes
- Six of the 17 elbows used for macroscopic measurement came from the same three individuals, reducing specimen independence
- Findings require validation in future biomechanical and clinical studies before direct clinical application
Why it matters
- For patients
- Overhead athletes, particularly baseball pitchers, may benefit from rehabilitation programs targeting finger flexor strength, which this anatomy suggests plays a greater stabilizing role than previously recognized.
- For clinicians
- The new three-type T-sign classification and the broader-than-expected capsular attachment width at the sublime tubercle may improve MRI diagnostic precision and help select patients for repair versus reconstruction.
- For readers
- This study challenges the conventional ligament-centric model of medial elbow stability by showing that the UCL is part of a larger, inseparable tendinous complex, which has implications for how all periarticular injuries at the medial elbow are interpreted.
Source
doi:10.1002/ca.23322
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the elbow special tests.
More Elbow studies
- Mid- to long-term functional outcome and return to sport after elbow dislocationPrimary study
- The effects of adding Mulligan mobilization with movement to exercise on elbow painPrimary study
- Defining tennis elbow characteristics: the assessment of magnetic resonance imagingPrimary study
- Elbow joint loads during simulated activities of daily living: implications after total elbow arthroplastyPrimary study
- A randomized controlled trial on pain, grip strength, and functionality in lateral elbow tendinopathyRCT
- Overhead arm positioning in the rehabilitation of elbow dislocations: an in vitro studyPrimary study