Effects of heavy slow resistance training combined with corticosteroid injections or tendon needling in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy: a 3-arm randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study
In short
Does adding a corticosteroid injection or tendon needling to a heavy slow resistance training program improve outcomes for chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy (tennis elbow)?
Heavy slow resistance training alone improved symptoms, function, and grip strength in the short and long term. Adding a corticosteroid injection not only failed to amplify these gains but was associated with clinically meaningful worsening of patient-reported function and symptoms at one-year follow-up compared to placebo needling.
ChallengesRead paper
Primary study58 ParticipantsModerate evidence
Key points
- All three groups improved equally at 12 weeks on pain, function, and grip strength with no between-group differences
- Corticosteroid injection produced an 80% reduction in tendon hypervascularization at 12 weeks, yet this did not translate into better pain or function
- At 52 weeks the corticosteroid group showed a clinically significant worsening on QuickDASH score (15 points higher than placebo, P = .0427)
- Tendon needling offered no advantage over placebo needling at any time point
- Training compliance was high across all groups (mean 83%), suggesting the HSR program is feasible at home with elastic bands
How it was conducted
- Design
- 3-arm randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (Level of evidence 1), conducted in Copenhagen, Denmark; registered NCT02521298
- Participants
- 58 adults (mean age 47.3 years; 53.4% female) with chronic unilateral lateral elbow tendinopathy confirmed by clinical tests and ultrasonography, symptom duration > 3 months
- Groups
- All received 12 weeks of home-based heavy slow resistance training with elastic bands; combined with (1) ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection (Depo-Medrol 40 mg/mL + lidocaine), (2) tendon needling with saline, or (3) placebo subcutaneous saline injection
- Primary outcome
- DASH score (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; 0-100) at 52 weeks
- Secondary outcomes
- QuickDASH, NRS pain (0-10), pain-free grip strength, and power Doppler hypervascularization area at 12, 26, and 52 weeks
- Follow-up
- 12, 26, and 52 weeks
What they found
- All groups improved by approximately 20 points on DASH and QuickDASH and 2.5 points on NRS at 12 weeks, with no significant between-group differences (DASH at 12 weeks: CSI vs PN delta -5.07, 95% CI -15.84 to 5.70, P = .3535)
- At 52 weeks, the CSI group tended toward worse DASH scores than the PN group (delta 14.24 points, 95% CI 2.52 to 25.95, P = .0176; overall group difference P = .0581)
- QuickDASH at 52 weeks was significantly worse in the CSI group versus PN group (delta 15.08 points, 95% CI 3.23 to 26.93, P = .0131; overall P = .0427)
- NRS pain at 52 weeks tended to be higher in the CSI group versus PN group (delta 1.79, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.36, P = .0259; overall P = .0784)
- Pain-free grip strength improved in all groups at 12 weeks (P < .0001 within groups); no significant between-group difference (CSI vs PN delta 10.03 kg, 95% CI 0.16 to 19.89, P = .0466; overall P = .1351)
- Hypervascularization (power Doppler area) decreased 80% in the CSI group vs 1% in the TN group and 24% in the PN group; CSI vs PN difference was significant at 12 weeks (delta -2251 pixels, 95% CI -4416 to -87, P = .0418)
- Area under the curve for DASH over all time points did not differ between groups (P = .2174)
- Mean training compliance was 83% (269 of 324 possible sets completed) with no difference between groups (P = .65)
Limitations
- No wait-and-see control group, so natural recovery cannot be ruled out as contributing to within-group improvements
- Study may have been underpowered to detect modest differences, as the actual SD of DASH scores was slightly higher than the assumed SD of 10 used in the power calculation
- The DASH questionnaire may be relatively insensitive for lateral elbow tendinopathy; the more specific Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation was not available in a validated Danish translation
- Blinding was imperfect: 52% in the CSI arm and 58% in the PN arm correctly guessed their allocation (expected 33% with perfect blinding)
Why it matters
- For patients
- Patients with chronic tennis elbow can expect meaningful improvement in pain and function from a home-based elastic band exercise program, and adding a cortisone injection is unlikely to help and may lead to worse outcomes a year later.
- For clinicians
- Corticosteroid injection as an adjunct to a structured heavy slow resistance program does not enhance short-term outcomes and is associated with clinically significant worsening of patient-reported function at 52 weeks, supporting caution about routine CSI use in this population.
- For readers
- This well-designed RCT adds to the evidence that exercise is the active ingredient in lateral elbow tendinopathy rehabilitation and that corticosteroid injections may interfere with long-term recovery even when combined with a structured loading program.
Source
doi:10.1177/03635465221110214
Read the original paperClinically assessing this area? See the elbow special tests.
More Elbow studies
- Mid- to long-term functional outcome and return to sport after elbow dislocationPrimary study
- The effects of adding Mulligan mobilization with movement to exercise on elbow painPrimary study
- Defining tennis elbow characteristics: the assessment of magnetic resonance imagingPrimary study
- Elbow joint loads during simulated activities of daily living: implications after total elbow arthroplastyPrimary study
- A randomized controlled trial on pain, grip strength, and functionality in lateral elbow tendinopathyRCT
- Overhead arm positioning in the rehabilitation of elbow dislocations: an in vitro studyPrimary study