PhysioHub

Plantar intrinsic foot muscle activation during functional exercises compared to isolated exercises

The verdict

Are functional exercises (such as toe stance, toe walking, and hopping) as effective as isolated foot exercises at activating the small muscles on the underside of the foot?

Functional exercises produced comparable or greater activation of plantar intrinsic foot muscles compared to the best muscle-specific isolated foot exercises, suggesting they are a viable and easier alternative for clinical use. However, this was a small lab study in healthy young adults, and long-term training effects remain unknown.

SupportsRead paper
Primary study29 ParticipantsLimited evidence

Key points

  1. Functional exercises matched or exceeded isolated foot exercise activation in 100% of comparisons; in 3 of 12 comparisons they were significantly higher.
  2. Hopping produced significantly greater activation of flexor hallucis brevis (median +48%) and abductor hallucis (median +108%) than the best isolated exercise.
  3. Toe stance on a compliant surface also produced significantly greater flexor hallucis brevis activation than its isolated counterpart.
  4. Integrated muscle activation (contraction duration x amplitude) was lower for dynamic exercises, but only 1-3 toe-walking steps or 3-9 hops were needed to match a 3-second isolated contraction.
  5. Isometric isolated exercises activated intrinsic foot muscles more than concentric exercises, but still did not outperform functional exercises.

How it was conducted

Design
Crossover experiment; all exercises performed in a single laboratory session
Participants
29 healthy younger adults (21 women, 8 men); mean age 23.3 years (SD 3.8)
Muscles measured
Abductor hallucis, flexor digitorum brevis, flexor hallucis brevis (plantar intrinsic); flexor hallucis longus (extrinsic, secondary)
Exercises compared
4 functional (toe stance, toe stance on compliant surface, toe walking, hopping) vs. the best muscle-specific isolated foot exercise for each of 3 muscles (12 comparisons total)
Outcome measure
Surface EMG mean amplitude (%) and integrated EMG over time (iEMG, %*s), normalised to a reference exercise
Statistics
Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (one-tailed, alpha=0.05) with Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple testing

What they found

  • 3 of 12 mean EMG amplitude comparisons showed significantly greater activation for functional exercises; 9 of 12 showed no significant difference.
  • Hopping vs. hallux grip (FHB): median difference +48%, IQR 4% to 80%, p<0.05.
  • Hopping vs. toe spread-out (AbH): median difference +108%, IQR 79% to 153%, p<0.05.
  • Toe stance on compliant surface vs. hallux grip (FHB): median difference +29%, IQR -9% to 54%, p<0.05.
  • iEMG was significantly smaller for functional exercises in 5 of 6 dynamic comparisons.
  • Toe walking iEMG was 2.8 times smaller than the isolated exercise for FHB (median difference -103%*s, IQR -215 to -66%*s, p<0.05) and 2.9 times smaller for FDB (median difference -99%*s, IQR -248 to -30%*s, p<0.05).
  • Hopping iEMG was 9.1 times smaller for FHB (median difference -157%*s, IQR -255 to -111%*s, p<0.05), 7.7 times smaller for FDB (median difference -160%*s, IQR -424 to -47%*s, p<0.05), and 2.4 times smaller for AbH (median difference -33%*s, IQR -327 to -15%*s, p<0.05).
  • Isometric exercises produced higher mean EMG than concentric exercises for FHB (median -14%, IQR -33 to -5%, p<0.05) and AbH (median -8%, IQR -72 to -4%, p<0.05), but concentric produced higher activation for FDB (median +23%, IQR -13% to 84%, p<0.05) and FHL (median +48%, IQR 24% to 86%, p<0.05).
  • Forward lean during toe stance did not significantly change PIFM activation (FHB p=0.05, FDB p=0.05, AbH p=0.22).

Limitations

  • All participants were healthy young adults; results may not apply to older adults, people with diabetic neuropathy, or those with PIFM dysfunction.
  • Surface EMG cannot fully isolate intrinsic from adjacent or deeper muscles, though prior literature suggests crosstalk remains within reasonable limits.
  • No objective performance measures (force plates, motion capture) were used, so suboptimal exercise execution cannot be ruled out.
  • Cross-sectional EMG data cannot predict long-term structural or functional adaptations from training.

Why it matters

For patients
Exercises like standing on your toes or toe walking may be just as good as, or better than, specialised foot exercises at working the small muscles of the foot, and are generally easier and more comfortable to perform.
For clinicians
Functional weight-bearing exercises in toe stance (toe walking, single-leg toe stance, hopping) can produce equivalent or superior intrinsic foot muscle activation compared to the best isolated foot exercises, and their ease of execution and adherence advantages make them a strong option for PIFM rehabilitation.
For readers
This is the first study to directly compare functional and isolated foot exercises for intrinsic foot muscle activation; findings support a shift toward functional training but require confirmation in clinical populations through longitudinal intervention studies.

Source

doi:10.1080/09593985.2023.2204947

Read the original paper
Clinically assessing this area? See the ankle & foot special tests.

More Ankle & Foot studies